ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
A comparison of characteristics and outcomes of operative treatment for Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion in older versus younger patients.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI-Based Classification of Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Reliability and Predictors of Tear Location.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- [Effectiveness analysis of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair technique combined with flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAchilles tendon sleeve avulsion (ATSA) is a rare injury that often results from pre-existing insertional Achilles tendinopathy and occurs when a tendon avulses from the insertion as a continuous sleeve. To date, outcomes of operative treatment for ATSA in older patients have not been reported. Therefore, this study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of Achilles tendon (AT) reattachment with or without tendon lengthening for ATSA between older and younger patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study enrolled 25 consecutive patients who underwent operative treatment following a diagnosis of ATSA between January 2006 and June 2020. The inclusion criterion was a minimum follow-up duration of one year. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to their age at operation: ≥ 65 years (group 1, 13 patients) and < 65 years (group 2, 12 patients). AT reattachment was performed in all patients using two 5.0-mm suture anchors after an inflamed distal stump resection in the 30° plantar-flexed ankle position.
resultsThe degree of active dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, mean visual analog scale score, and Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles scores at the final follow-up were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05 each). The rate of satisfactory clinical outcomes (defined as fair or greater) was 84.6% and 91.7% in groups 1 and 2, respectively.
conclusionWe observed that comparable clinical outcomes could be achieved after AT reattachment with or without lengthening for ATSA between older and younger patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.