Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341699›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Systematic analysis of the molecular and biophysical properties of key DNA damage response factors.

Joshua R Heyza, Mariia Mikhova, Aastha Bahl, David G Broadbent, Jens C Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua R HeyzaInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0847-0501
Mariia MikhovaInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.
Aastha BahlInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.
David G BroadbentInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0940-1068
Jens C SchmidtInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9061-7853
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Single-molecule Analysis of the DNA Damage Response in Living CellsDP2GM142307 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, JENS CHRISTOPHER · 2020 to 2020
$2.1M
Defining the mechanism of Shieldin complex in DNA end joiningF32GM139292 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEYZA, JOSHUA · 2020 to 2022
$201k
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM142307NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM139292NIH HHS DP2GM142307NIH HHS F32GM139292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is integral to preserving genomic integrity. Therefore, defining the mechanisms underlying DSB repair will enhance our understanding of how defects in these pathways contribute to human disease and could lead to the discovery of new approaches for therapeutic intervention. Here, we established a panel of HaloTagged DNA damage response factors in U2OS cells which enables concentration-dependent protein labeling by fluorescent HaloTag ligands. Genomic insertion of HaloTag at the endogenous loci of these repair factors preserves expression levels and proteins retain proper subcellular localization, foci-forming ability, and functionally support DSB repair. We systematically analyzed total cellular protein abundance, measured recruitment kinetics to laser-induced DNA damage sites, and defined the diffusion dynamics and chromatin binding characteristics by live-cell single-molecule imaging. Our work demonstrates that the Shieldin complex, a critical factor in end-joining, does not exist in a preassembled state and that relative accumulation of these factors at DSBs occurs with different kinetics. Additionally, live-cell single-molecule imaging revealed the constitutive interaction between MDC1 and chromatin mediated by its PST repeat domain. Altogether, our studies demonstrate the utility of single-molecule imaging to provide mechanistic insights into DNA repair, which will serve as a powerful resource for characterizing the biophysical properties of DNA repair factors in living cells.

Indexed as

ChromatinDNA RepairDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageHumansTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1ChromatinTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1biophysicschromosomesDNA repairgene expressionhumanmolecular biophysicssingle-molecule imagingstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID37341699
PMCPMC10319438
OpenAlexW4381470177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.