Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341687›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2023

More airway smooth muscle in males versus females in a mouse model of asthma: A blessing in disguise?

Rebecka Gill, Andrés Rojas-Ruiz, Magali Boucher, Cyndi Henry, Ynuk Bossé

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sex and the Developmental Environment Shape Molecular Networks Underlying Bronchial Responsiveness in Mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. The testosterone paradox in asthma.Frontiers in allergy · 2026
    Review
  4. Sex, hormones, and lung health.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Quick Method to Assess Airway Distensibility in Mice.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecka GillInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Université Laval, Département de médecine, Québec, Canada.
Andrés Rojas-RuizInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Université Laval, Département de médecine, Québec, Canada.
Magali BoucherInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Université Laval, Département de médecine, Québec, Canada.
Cyndi HenryInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Université Laval, Département de médecine, Québec, Canada.
Ynuk BosséInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Université Laval, Département de médecine, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2023-3130
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT-387910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NEW

findingsWhat is the central question of this study? The lung response to inhaled methacholine is reputed to be greater in male than in female mice. The underpinnings of this sex disparity are ill defined. What is the main finding and its importance? We demonstrated that male airways exhibit a greater content of airway smooth muscle than female airways. We also found that, although a more muscular airway tree in males might contribute to their greater responsiveness to inhaled methacholine than females, it might also curb the heterogeneity in small airway narrowing. ABSTRACT: Mouse models are helpful in unveiling the mechanisms underlying sex disparities in asthma. In comparison to their female counterparts, male mice are hyperresponsive to inhaled methacholine, a cardinal feature of asthma that contributes to its symptoms. The physiological details and the structural underpinnings of this hyperresponsiveness in males are currently unknown. Herein, BALB/c mice were exposed intranasally to either saline or house dust mite once daily for 10 consecutive days to induce experimental asthma. Twenty-four hours after the last exposure, respiratory mechanics were measured at baseline and after a single dose of inhaled methacholine that was adjusted to trigger the same degree of bronchoconstriction in both sexes (it was twice as high in females). Bronchoalveolar lavages were then collected, and the lungs were processed for histology. House dust mite increased the number of inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavages to the same extent in both sexes (asthma, P = 0.0005; sex, P = 0.96). The methacholine response was also markedly increased by asthma in both sexes (e.g., P = 0.0002 for asthma on the methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction). However, for a well-matched bronchoconstriction between sexes, the increase in hysteresivity, an indicator of airway narrowing heterogeneity, was attenuated in males for both control and asthmatic mice (sex, P = 0.002). The content of airway smooth muscle was not affected by asthma but was greater in males (asthma, P = 0.31; sex, P < 0.0001). These results provide further insights regarding an important sex disparity in mouse models of asthma. The increased amount of airway smooth muscle in males might contribute functionally to their greater methacholine response and, possibly, to their decreased propensity for airway narrowing heterogeneity.

Indexed as

AsthmaAnimalsBronchoconstrictionFemaleLungMaleMethacholine ChlorideMiceMuscle, SmoothMethacholine Chlorideairway hyperresponsivenessairway remodellingallergic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID37341687
PMCPMC10988431
OpenAlexW4381470151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.