Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341260›Full record

Trial reportRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2023

Auriculotherapy for reducing chronic spinal pain in health workers: a clinical trial.

Bruna Xavier Morais, Oclaris Lopes Munhoz, Carlos Heitor Cunha Moreira, Leonice Fumiko Sato Kurebayashi, Luis Felipe Dias Lopes, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza Magnago

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bruna Xavier MoraisUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0446-9231
Oclaris Lopes MunhozUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-7148
Carlos Heitor Cunha MoreiraUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Estomatologia, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-0067
Leonice Fumiko Sato KurebayashiUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-3225
Luis Felipe Dias LopesUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Ciências Administrativas, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2438-0226
Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza MagnagoUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Enfermagem, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-1604
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRCoordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto evaluate the effectiveness of auriculotherapy in reducing chronic musculoskeletal pain in the spine of health workers.

methoda randomized, triple-blind clinical trial conducted with health workers diagnosed with chronic spinal pain. Eight sessions of auriculotherapy with seeds were applied, two per week. The outcomes were measured with the Numerical Pain Scale, Brief Pain Inventory, Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and SF-36 instruments, in the 1st, 4th and 8th session, and in the 15-day follow-up period. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed.

results34 workers took part in the Intervention Group and 33 in the Control Group, and both presented reduced pain intensity (p>0.05). In the follow-up period, there was a greater reduction in the Intervention Group (3.32 ± 0.42), when compared to the Control Group (5.00 ± 0.43) (p=0.007). In quality of life, there was improved vitality (p=0.012) and limitation due to emotional aspects (p=0.025). The relationship between auriculotherapy, physical disability and pain interference did not differ between the groups (p>0.05). Medication use in the follow-up period remained unchanged in the Control Group (77.8%) when compared to the Intervention Group (22.2%) (p=0.013).

conclusionauriculotherapy exerted the same effect between the groups on pain intensity, lasting longer in the follow-up period. There was an improvement in quality of life and a reduction in medication use. REBEC: RBR-3jvmdn.

Indexed as

AuriculotherapyChronic PainHealth PersonnelHealth WorkforceHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37341260
PMCPMC10306058
OpenAlexW4381234958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.