Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37341201›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2023

Association between

Domen Ribnikar, Valentina Jeric Horvat, Ivica Ratosa, Zachary W Veitch, Biljana Grcar Kuzmanov, Srdjan Novakovic, Erik Langerholc, Eitan Amir, Bostjan Seruga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Domen RibnikarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Valentina Jeric HorvatDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivica RatosaFaculty of Medicine Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zachary W VeitchDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Bariie, Ontario, USA.
Biljana Grcar KuzmanovDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Srdjan NovakovicDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Erik LangerholcInstitute of Biostatistics and informatics, Faculty of Medicine Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eitan AmirDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Bostjan SerugaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the independent prognostic role of PATIENTS AND

methodsA single institution study of patients with early-stage ILC treated between 2003 and 2008 was performed. Clinicopathological parameters, systemic therapy exposure and outcomes (distant metastasis-free survival [DMFS] and overall survival [OS]) were collected based on presence or absence of PIK3CA activating mutation in the primary tumor determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay. An association between PIK3CA mutation status and prognosis in all patient cohort was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, whereas an association between PIK3CA mutation and ET was analyzed in estrogen receptors (ER) and/or progesterone receptors (PR)-positive group of our patients by the Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsMedian age at diagnosis of all patients was 62.8 years and median follow-up time was 10.8 years. Among 365 patients, PIK3CA activating mutations were identified in 45%. PIK3CA activating mutations were not associated with differential DMFS and OS (p = 0.36 and p = 0.42, respectively). In patients with PIK3CA mutation each year of tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) decreased the risk of death by 27% and 21% in comparison to no ET, respectively. The type and duration of ET did not have significant impact on DMFS, however longer duration of ET had a favourable impact on OS.

conclusionsPIK3CA activating mutations are not associated with an impact on DMFS and OS in early-stage ILC. Patients with PIK3CA mutation had a statistically significantly decreased risk of death irrespective of whether they received TAM or an AI.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMutationTamoxifenClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanTamoxifenendocrine therapygenomics of invasive lobular carcinomainvasive lobular carcinomaPIK3CA mutation

Identifiers

PMID37341201
PMCPMC10286895
OpenAlexW4381469543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.