Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340977›Full record

ReviewCirculation. Cardiovascular interventions2023

Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction.

Suresh Vedantham, Peter Gloviczki, Teresa L Carman, Sandra Zelman Lewis, Peter A Schneider, Saher S Sabri, Raghu Kolluri

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevention of the Postthrombotic Syndrome: Where Do We Stand?Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Suresh VedanthamWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (S.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-5734-7553
Peter GloviczkiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.G.).
Teresa L CarmanUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH (T.L.C.).
Sandra Zelman LewisEBQ Consulting, LLC, Northbrook, IL (S.Z.).ORCID 0000-0003-3934-4452
Peter A SchneiderUniversity of California, San Francisco (P.A.S.).
Saher S SabriMedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (S.S.S.).
Raghu KolluriOhioHealth Heart and Vascular, Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus (R.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-4374-7513
Consultants in Neurology · USGeorgetown University · USMayo Clinic · USRiverside Methodist Hospital · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

1/2 CATHETER-DIRECTED THERAPY FOR CHRONIC DVT (C-TRACT TRIAL)UH3HL138325 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VEDANTHAM, SURESH · 2018 to 2023
$8.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL138325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresVenous ThrombosisDelphi TechniqueFemoral VeinHumansIliac VeinRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeVascular Patencyhumansphysiciansstentsthrombectomythrombosis

Identifiers

PMID37340977
PMCPMC10348641
OpenAlexW4381469730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.