Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340870›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2023

Assessment of endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscopy (EBUS) intranodal forceps biopsy added to EBUS 19-gauge transbronchial needle aspiration: A blinded pathology panel analysis.

Samy Lachkar, Quentin Faur, Florent Marguet, Liana Veresezan, Michael Bubenheim, Mathieu Salaün, Luc Thiberville, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Florian Guisier, Nicolas Piton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samy LachkarCHU Rouen, Department of Pneumology, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7871-0887
Quentin FaurCHU Rouen, Department of Pathology, Rouen, France.
Florent MarguetCHU Rouen, Department of Pathology, Rouen, France.
Liana VeresezanCentre Henri Becquerel, Department of Pathology, Rouen, France.
Michael BubenheimCHU Rouen, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Rouen, France.
Mathieu SalaünCHU Rouen, Department of Pneumology, Rouen, France.
Luc ThibervilleCHU Rouen, Department of Pneumology, Rouen, France.
Jean-Christophe SabourinCHU Rouen, Department of Pathology, Rouen, France.
Florian GuisierCHU Rouen, Department of Pneumology, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8166-7303
Nicolas PitonCHU Rouen, Department of Pathology, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-586X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has significantly improved the diagnostic workup for intrathoracic lymphadenopathies. More recently, EBUS intranodal forceps biopsy (IFB) has been developed in an attempt to maximize diagnostic yield by providing additional tissue. In this study, we aimed to assess the improvement of diagnostic yield with EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-IFB, compared to EBUS-TBNA alone.

methodsConsecutive patients who had 19-G EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-IFB from August 30, 2018, to September 28, 2021, were included. Four senior pathologists retrospectively analyzed, independently and blindly, first, only the EBUS-TBNA samples (cell block), then, at least 1 month later, both samples from EBUS-TBNA and from EBUS-IFB together.

resultsFifty patients were included in the study and 52 lymph nodes were analyzed. Diagnostic yield was 77% (40/52) for EBUS-TBNA alone and 94% (49/52) when combined with EBUS-IFB (p = 0.023). Malignancy was diagnosed with EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-IFB in 25/26 cases (96%), versus 22/26 (85%) with EBUS-TBNA alone (p = 0.35); and 4/5 (80%) versus 2/5 (40%) for lymphoma specifically. Kappa interobserver agreement was 0.92 for EBUS-IFB and 0.87 for EBUS-TBNA alone. Nonmalignant condition was diagnosed with EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-IFB in 24/26 cases (92%), versus 18/26 (69%) for EBUS-TBNA alone (p = 0.07).

conclusionThe use of EBUS-IFB combined with 19-G EBUS-TBNA improves the mediastinal lymph node diagnostic yield However the benefit appears to be mainly restricted to nonmalignant histology.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyNeoplasmsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationHumansLymph NodesMediastinumRetrospective Studies19-gauge needleendobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopyintranodal forceps biopsythoracic lymphadenopathytransbronchial needle aspiration

Identifiers

PMID37340870
PMCPMC10396793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.