Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340705›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2023

Additional occult cancers identified on staging breast MRI: imaging appearances and pathologic characteristics.

Lara Nassar, Sanaa Nakad, Farah Abou Zeid, Zeina Farah, Ghida Saheb, Nayla Mroueh, Patrick Debs, Ghina Berjawi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lara NassarDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-2224
Sanaa NakadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology/Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Farah Abou ZeidDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Zeina FarahMinistry of Public Health-Epidemiological Surveillance Program, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghida SahebDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nayla MrouehDepartment of Radiology/Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Patrick DebsThe Russel H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ghina BerjawiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBGynecologic Oncology Group · USJohns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMinistry of Public Health · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for staging of patients with breast cancer due to its high sensitivity in detecting additional cancers (ACs). However, the clinical impact of diagnosing and treating these cancers remains unclear.

methodsA retrospective study was undertaken of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent staging MRI at The American University of Beirut Medical Centre (AUBMC) between 2012 and 2020. Pathology reports and breast MRI examinations were reviewed. Eighteen breast cancer patients with 19 pathology-proven index cancers (ICs) and 19 pathology-proven MRI-detected ACs were included. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed rank test for numerical variables were used to compare ICs to ACs.

resultsThe ICs consisted of four ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 13 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), of which five with associated DCIS, and two invasive lobular carcinomas, (ILC) of which one with associated DCIS. ACs comprised 12 DCIS, five IDC, two with associated DCIS and two ILC, one with associated DCIS. Interval cancers were more frequently invasive whereas ACs were more frequently in situ (P = 0.021). ACs were more frequently nuclear grade 2 (P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between ICs and ACs in lesion type (P = 0.062), shape (P = 0.073), initial enhancement (P = 1), delayed enhancement (P = 0.732), hormonal receptor profile (P = 0.68) and Ki67 (P = 0.388). Among ACs, ten (53%) were larger than 10 mm of which five (26%) were invasive cancers, and five (26%) were larger than the ICs.

conclusionsACs detected by breast MRI were more likely to be in situ and to show a nuclear grade 2. Although not reaching statistical significance, some ACs tend to be clinically significant by their type, size or nuclear grade. The impact on clinical management remains to be determined.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studiesbreast cancerbreast MRIpathologystaging

Identifiers

PMID37340705
PMCPMC10715349
OpenAlexW4381469869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.