Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340475›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2023

Learning from intersectoral initiatives to respond to the needs of refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status in the context of COVID-19 in Quebec and Ontario: a qualitative multiple case study protocol.

Lara Gautier, Erica Di Ruggiero, Carly Jackson, Naïma Bentayeb, Marie-Jeanne Blain, Fariha Chowdhury, Serigne Touba Mbacké Gueye, Muzhgan Haydary, Lara Maillet, Laila Mahmoudi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Community health worker outreach to farmworkers in rural North Carolina: Learning from adaptations to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Lara GautierSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Suite 3076, 7101 Av du Parc, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada. lara.gautier@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-295X
Erica Di RuggieroDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Carly JacksonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Naïma BentayebSHERPA University Institute, CIUSSS West Central Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-Jeanne BlainCentre de recherche et de partage des savoirs InterActions, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Fariha ChowdhurySchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Serigne Touba Mbacké GueyeUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Sherbrooke, Canada.
Muzhgan HaydaryUniversité du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM), Montreal, Canada.
Lara MailletÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montreal, Canada.
Laila MahmoudiSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Suite 3076, 7101 Av du Parc, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Shinjini MondalDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Armel Ouffouet BessiranthySchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Suite 3076, 7101 Av du Parc, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Pierre PluyeMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Saliha ZiamÉcole des Sciences de l'administration, Université TÉLUQ, Montreal, Canada.
Nassera TouatiÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montreal, Canada.
École Nationale d'Administration Publique · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAMcGill University · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue · CAUniversité TÉLUQ · CA

Funding

CIHR PUU177961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status experience precarious living and working conditions that disproportionately expose them to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In the two most populous Canadian provinces (Quebec and Ontario), to reduce the vulnerability factors experienced by the most marginalized migrants, the public and community sectors engage in joint coordination efforts called intersectoral collaboration. This collaboration ensures holistic care provisioning, inclusive of psychosocial support, assistance to address food security, and educational and employment assistance. This research project explores how community and public sectors collaborated on intersectoral initiatives during the COVID-19 pandemic to support refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status in the cities of Montreal, Sherbrooke, and Toronto, and generates lessons for a sustainable response to the heterogeneous needs of these migrants.

methodsThis theory-informed participatory research is co-created with socioculturally diverse research partners (refugees, asylum seekers and migrants without status, employees of community organizations, and employees of public organizations). We will utilize Mirzoev and Kane's framework on health systems' responsiveness to guide the four phases of a qualitative multiple case study (a case being an intersectoral initiative). These phases will include (1) building an inventory of intersectoral initiatives developed during the pandemic, (2) organizing a deliberative workshop with representatives of the study population, community, and public sector respondents to select and validate the intersectoral initiatives, (3) interviews (n = 80) with community and public sector frontline workers and managers, municipal/regional/provincial policymakers, and employees of philanthropic foundations, and (4) focus groups (n = 80) with refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status. Qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings will be used to develop discussion forums to spur cross-learning among service providers. DISCUSSION: This research will highlight the experiences of community and public organizations in their ability to offer responsive services for refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status in the context of a pandemic. We will draw lessons learnt from the promising practices developed in the context of COVID-19, to improve services beyond times of crisis. Lastly, we will reflect upon our participatory approach-particularly in relation to the engagement of refugees and asylum seekers in the governance of our research.

Indexed as

COVID-19RefugeesTransients and MigrantsHumansOntarioPandemicsQuebecAsylum seekersCommunity organizationsCOVID-19Intersectoral collaborationMigrants without statusPublic service providersRefugees

Identifiers

PMID37340475
PMCPMC10280952
OpenAlexW4381430256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.