Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340455›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Aspect-based classification of vaccine misinformation: a spatiotemporal analysis using Twitter chatter.

Heba Ismail, Nada Hussein, Rawan Elabyad, Salma Abdelhalim, Mourad Elhadef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mapping Infodemic Responses: A Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Twitter (X) in Medicine: Friend or Foe to the Field of Interventional Cardiology?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heba IsmailCollege of Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. heba.ismail@adu.ac.ae.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-9872
Nada HusseinCollege of Engineering, Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Rawan ElabyadCollege of Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Salma AbdelhalimCollege of Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Mourad ElhadefCollege of Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-7634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe spread of misinformation of all types threatens people's safety and interrupts resolutions. COVID-19 vaccination has been a widely discussed topic on social media platforms with numerous misleading and fallacious information. This false information has a critical impact on the safety of society as it prevents many people from taking the vaccine, decelerating the world's ability to go back to normal. Therefore, it is vital to analyze the content shared on social media platforms, detect misinformation, identify aspects of misinformation, and efficiently represent related statistics to combat the spread of misleading information about the vaccine. This paper aims to support stakeholders in decision-making by providing solid and current insights into the spatiotemporal progression of the common misinformation aspects of the various available vaccines.

methodsApproximately 3800 tweets were annotated into four expert-verified aspects of vaccine misinformation obtained from reliable medical resources. Next, an Aspect-based Misinformation Analysis Framework was designed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, which is one of the most advanced, fast, and efficient machine learning models to date. Based on this dataset, spatiotemporal statistical analysis was performed to infer insights into the progression of aspects of vaccine misinformation among the public. Finally, the Pearson correlation coefficient and p-values are calculated for the global misinformation count against the vaccination counts of 43 countries from December 2020 until July 2021.

resultsThe optimized classification per class (i.e., per an aspect of misinformation) accuracy was 87.4%, 92.7%, 80.1%, and 82.5% for the "Vaccine Constituent," "Adverse Effects," "Agenda," "Efficacy and Clinical Trials" aspects, respectively. The model achieved an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 90.3% and 89.6% for validation and testing, respectively, which indicates the reliability of the proposed framework in detecting aspects of vaccine misinformation on Twitter. The correlation analysis shows that 37% of the countries addressed in this study were negatively affected by the spread of misinformation on Twitter resulting in reduced number of administered vaccines during the same timeframe.

conclusionsTwitter is a rich source of insight on the progression of vaccine misinformation among the public. Machine Learning models, such as LightGBM, are efficient for multi-class classification and proved reliable in classifying vaccine misinformation aspects even with limited samples in social media datasets.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSocial MediaHumansReproducibility of ResultsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesAspect-based analysisCOVID-19 vaccineLightGBMMachine learningMisinformationTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37340455
PMCPMC10283216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.