Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340447›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Cesarean section rates according to the Robson Classification and its association with adequacy levels of prenatal care: a cross-sectional hospital-based study in Brazil.

Veridiana Monteiro Ramos Piva, Verena Voget, Luciana Bertoldi Nucci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Models for the Risk of Emergency Caesarean Births.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veridiana Monteiro Ramos PivaHealth Sciences Post Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop, S/N - Jd. Ipaussurama, Campinas - São Paulo, CEP: 13060-904, Brazil. veridiana.piva@puc-campinas.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-1946
Verena VogetFaculty of Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop, S/N - Jd. Ipaussurama, Campinas - São Paulo, CEP: 13060-904, Brazil.
Luciana Bertoldi NucciHealth Sciences Post Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop, S/N - Jd. Ipaussurama, Campinas - São Paulo, CEP: 13060-904, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rate of Cesarean section (CS) deliveries has been increasing worldwide for decades. Brazil exhibits high rates of patient-requested CS deliveries. Prenatal care is essential for reducing and preventing maternal and child morbidity and mortality, ensuring women's health and well-being. The aim of this study was to verify the association between the level of prenatal care, as measured by the Kotelchuck (APNCU - Adequacy of the prenatal care utilization) index and CS rates.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study based on data from routine hospital digital records and federal public health system databases (2014-2017). We performed descriptive analyses, prepared Robson Classification Report tables, and estimated the CS rate for the relevant Robson groups across distinct levels of prenatal care. Our analysis also considered the payment source for each childbirth - either public healthcare or private health insurers - and maternal sociodemographic data.

resultsCS rate by level of access to prenatal care was 80.0% for no care, 45.2% for inadequate, 44.2% for intermediate, 43.0% for adequate, and 50.5% for the adequate plus category. No statistically significant associations were found between the adequacy of prenatal care and the rate of cesarean sections in any of the most relevant Robson groups, across both public (n = 7,359) and private healthcare (n = 1,551) deliveries.

conclusionAccess to prenatal care, according to the trimester in which prenatal care was initiated and the number of prenatal visits, was not associated with the cesarean section rate, suggesting that factors that assess the quality of prenatal care, not simply adequacy of access, should be investigated.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionPrenatal CareBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansParturitionPregnancyAPNCU indexBrazilCesarean sectionsEpidemiologyMode of deliveryPrenatalRobson classification

Identifiers

PMID37340447
PMCPMC10283223
OpenAlexW4381433543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.