Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340385›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2023

Using human-centered design to co-design dedicated menstrual health spaces with people who menstruate in Bidi Bidi refugee settlement, Uganda: Learnings for further adaptation and scale in humanitarian settings.

Aly Beeman, Joseph Kwesiga, Nicole Ippoliti, Tanya Bhandari, Geetika Pandya, Faith Anne Acam, Saehee Lee, Rebecca Hope, Theodora Gibbs, Jordan Levine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Aly BeemanYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda. Aly.beeman@ylabsglobal.org.
Joseph KwesigaYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Nicole IppolitiYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Tanya BhandariYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Geetika PandyaYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Faith Anne AcamYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Saehee LeeYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rebecca HopeYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Theodora GibbsYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jordan LevineYouth Development Labs (YLabs), KN 14 St, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rwanda Development Board · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people who menstruate in low- and middle-income countries struggle to manage their menstruation safely, hygienically, and with dignity. This is exacerbated in humanitarian settings with limited access to menstrual products and safe, private spaces for changing, washing, and disposing of menstrual products. To address these challenges, Youth Development Labs (YLabs) used a human-centered design approach to co-design the Cocoon Mini, a safe, physical structure for managing menstruation in the Bidi Bidi Refugee Settlement in Uganda.

methodsThe study comprised five phases, including background research, design research, rough prototyping, live prototyping, and a pilot study. A total of 340 people, including people who menstruate, male community members, and community stakeholders, participated in interviews, focus groups, and co-design sessions. Solution prototypes were created, evaluated, and iterated upon in each successive project phase. The final intervention design, the Cocoon Mini, was evaluated qualitatively for feasibility and acceptability during a three-month pilot using structured interviews with 109 people who menstruate utilizing Cocoon Mini structures, 64 other community members, and 20 Cocoon Mini supervisors.

resultsResults showed widespread desirability and acceptability of the Cocoon Mini among people who menstruate and other community members. Overall, 95% (104/109) of people who menstruate stated the space had made menstrual health management easier, primarily by providing designated waste bins, solar lights, and additional water sources. The Cocoon Mini provided an increased sense of physical and psychological safety in knowing where to privately manage menstruation. Furthermore, the Cocoon Mini demonstrated that an intervention could be run and maintained sustainably at the household level in humanitarian contexts, without continued external stakeholder intervention. Each Cocoon Mini structure costs approximately $360 USD to build and maintain and serves 15-20 people who menstruate, leading to a cost per person of $18-$24. Furthermore, attaching an incinerator to the structure for easier and quicker disposal of waste bin contents (compared to transporting full waste bins elsewhere) costs $2110 USD.

conclusionsPeople who menstruate lack access to safe, private spaces for menstrual health and product disposal in humanitarian settings. The Cocoon Mini provides a solution for the safe and effective management of menstruation. Customizing and scaling up dedicated menstrual health spaces should be considered a high-priority intervention in humanitarian settings.

Indexed as

MenstruationRefugeesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMenstrual Hygiene ProductsPilot ProjectsUgandaGenderHuman-centered designMenstrual hygiene managementMenstruationRefugeeWaste managementWater, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)

Identifiers

PMID37340385
PMCPMC10280881
OpenAlexW4381335323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.