Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340372›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2023

Spatial distribution and factors influencing modern contraceptive practice among tribal married women in India: evidence from National Family Health Survey 5 (2019-2021).

Sushree Nibedita Panda, Manish Barik, Ardhendu Sekhar Acharya, Srikanta Kanungo, Sanghamitra Pati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effectiveness of Midwife Led Teaching on Knowledge, Attitude, and Readiness to Practice on Chhaya Pills among Reproductive Women in Puducherry.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sushree Nibedita Panda *ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0085-8878
Manish Barik *ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7582-1047
Ardhendu Sekhar AcharyaICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Srikanta Kanungo *ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. srikantak109@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5647-0122
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. drsanghamitra12@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7717-5592
Regional Medical Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unmet need for family planning has been a public health concern in developing countries, especially in the south-east region. In India, the expanding roles of women has led to a growing need for family planning and contraception. However, tribal women still struggle with reproductive and sexual health issues. Unfortunately, most tribal women are not informed about the potential health risks associated with contraceptive use, as service providers often neglect to provide this information. As a result, tribal women often suffer in silence, which can lead to serious health problems. Thus, the present study aimed to understand the patterns and factors associated with modern contraceptive usage as well as the district level variation in usage among tribal married women.

methodsWe included 91,976 tribal married women participants aged 15 to 49 years from National Family Health Survey 5 conducted during the years 2019 to 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to compute the prevalence of modern contraceptive usage along with 95% confidence interval (CI) as a measure of uncertainty. The association between various socio-demographic predictors and modern contraceptive usage were assessed by multivariable logistic regression and presented as an adjusted odds ratio (AOR).

resultsThe overall prevalence of modern contraceptive practices was found to be 53% among tribal married women, which was below the national average. Sterilization was the most preferred method of modern contraceptive, whereas injectables were the least preferred method. More than 80% of the married women get the family planning information from the public health facility and health workers. Districts of eastern and north-eastern states have comparatively less modern contraceptive prevalence than central and southern states. Age, education, parity and access to media were significantly associated with the use of modern methods of contraception.

conclusionImproving contraceptive use and reducing unmet needs for contraception among tribal women requires sustained efforts from healthcare workers, including Information Education and Communication (IEC) through mass media to raise awareness. A tailored family planning strategy is crucial to address the specific needs of tribal women at both the local and national levels, with adequate resources and monitoring for impact with this India can achieve Total Fertility Rate (TFR) 2.1 among tribals.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHealth SurveysHumansPregnancySterilization, ReproductiveContraceptive AgentsContraceptiveFamily planningIndiaTribals

Identifiers

PMID37340372
PMCPMC10281003
OpenAlexW4381436654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.