Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340324›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2023

Real-life effectiveness of anti-malarial treatment regimens: what are we aiming for?

Dorothea Ekoka Mbassi, Christoph Pfaffendorf, Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma, Benno Kreuels, Michael Ramharter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorothea Ekoka MbassiDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph PfaffendorfDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Ghyslain Mombo-NgomaDepartment of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Benno KreuelsDepartment of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael RamharterDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany. ramharter@bnitm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-day artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is the current standard of care for the treatment of malaria. However, specific drug resistance associated with reduced efficacy of ACT has been observed, therefore necessitating the clinical development of new anti-malarial drugs and drug combinations. Previously, Single Encounter Radical Cure and Prophylaxis (SERCAP) has been proposed as ideal target-product-profile for any new anti-malarial drug regimen as this would improve treatment adherence besides ensuring complete cure and prevention of early reinfection. Arguably, this concept may not be ideal as it (1) necessitates administration of an excessively high dose of drug to achieve plasmodicidal plasma levels for a sufficient time span, (2) increases the risk for drug related adverse drug reactions, and (3) leaves the patient with a one-time opportunity to achieve-or not-cure by a single drug intake. Over the past years, SERCAP has led to the halt of promising drug development programmes, leading to potentially unnecessary attrition in the anti-malarial development pipeline. One proposition could be the concept of single-day multi-dose regimens as a potentially better alternative, as this allows to (1) administer a lower dose of the drug at each time-point leading to better tolerability and safety, (2) increase treatment adherence based on the intake of the anti-malarial drug within 24 h when malaria-related symptoms are still present, and (3) have more than one opportunity for adequate intake of the drug in case of early vomiting or other factors causing reduced bioavailability. In line with a recently published critical viewpoint on the concept of SERCAP, an alternative proposition is-in contrast to the current World Health Organization (WHO) treatment guidelines-to aim for less than three days, but still multiple-dose anti-malarial treatment regimens. This may help to strike the optimal balance between improving treatment adherence, maximizing treatment effectiveness, while keeping attrition of new drugs and drug regimens as low as possible.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsMalariaMalaria, FalciparumDrug CombinationsHumansAntimalarialsArtemisininsDrug CombinationsAntimalarialsDrug developmentMalariaSingle-daySingle-doseTolerabilityTreatment schedule

Identifiers

PMID37340324
PMCPMC10280843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.