Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340279›Full record

ReviewOecologia2023

How ecological and evolutionary theory expanded the 'ideal weed' concept.

Jennifer A Lau, Jennifer L Funk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oecologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Response of the Invasive Alien PlantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Plant traits reveal that biotic resistance to invasibility is shaped by slope aspect.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer A Lau *Department of Biology and the Environmental Resilience Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Jennifer L Funk *Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. funk@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1916-5513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since Baker's attempt to characterize the 'ideal weed' over 50 years ago, ecologists have sought to identify features of species that predict invasiveness. Several of Baker's 'ideal weed' traits are well studied, and we now understand that many traits can facilitate different components of the invasion process, such as dispersal traits promoting transport or selfing enabling establishment. However, the effects of traits on invasion are context dependent. The traits promoting invasion in one community or at one invasion stage may inhibit invasion of other communities or success at other invasion stages, and the benefits of any given trait may depend on the other traits possessed by the species. Furthermore, variation in traits among populations or species is the result of evolution. Accordingly, evolution both prior to and after invasion may determine invasion outcomes. Here, we review how our understanding of the ecology and evolution of traits in invasive plants has developed since Baker's original efforts, resulting from empirical studies and the emergence of new frameworks and ideas such as community assembly theory, functional ecology, and rapid adaptation. Looking forward, we consider how trait-based approaches might inform our understanding of less-explored aspects of invasion biology ranging from invasive species responses to climate change to coevolution of invaded communities.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesPlantsEcosystemAdaptationCommunity assemblyFunctional traitsInvasivenessSpecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID37340279
PMCPMC10684629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.