Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340277›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Effectiveness of endourological management of ureteral stenosis in kidney transplant patients: EAU-YAU kidney transplantation working group collaboration.

Angelo Territo, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Iulia Andras, Riccardo Campi, Alessio Pecoraro, Vital Hevia, Thomas Prudhomme, Michael Baboudjian, Andrea Gallioli, Paolo Verri and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Angelo Territo *Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340, Fundació Puigvert, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandra Bravo-Balado *Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340, Fundació Puigvert, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. alejandra.bravo146@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9555-393X
Iulia AndrasUrology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania.
Riccardo CampiUnit of Urologic Robotic, Minimally-Invasive Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessio PecoraroUnit of Urologic Robotic, Minimally-Invasive Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Vital HeviaHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. Alcalá University. Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Thomas PrudhommeDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Michael BaboudjianDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340, Fundació Puigvert, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrea GallioliDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340, Fundació Puigvert, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo VerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340, Fundació Puigvert, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Mathieu CharbonnierDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, CHU de La Conception Hospital, 146, Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Romain Boissier *Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, CHU de La Conception Hospital, 146, Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Alberto Breda *Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340, Fundació Puigvert, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITHôpital de la Conception · FRInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROPuigvert Foundation · ESUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUreteral stenosis (US) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is associated with poorer long-term graft survival. Surgical repair is the standard of care, and endoscopic treatment represents an alternative for stenosis < 3 cm. We aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of endourological management of US in KT patients and predictors of failure.

methodsA retrospective multicenter study was conducted in four European referral centers, including all KT patients with US managed endoscopically between 2009 and 2021. Clinical success was defined as the absence of upper urinary tract catheterization, surgical repair or transplantectomy during follow-up.

resultsA total of 44 patients were included. The median time to US onset was 3.5 months (IQR 1.9-10.8), the median length of stricture was 10 mm (IQR 7-20). Management of US involved balloon dilation and laser incision in 34 (79.1%) and 6 (13.9%) cases, respectively, while 2 (4.7%) received both. Clavien-Dindo complications were infrequent (10%); only one Clavien ≥ III complication was reported. Clinical success was 61% at last follow-up visit (median = 44.6 months). In the bivariate analysis, duckbill-shaped stenosis (vs. flat/concave) was associated with treatment success (RR = 0.39, p = 0.04, 95% CI 0.12-0.76), while late-onset stenosis (> 3 months post KT) with treatment failure (RR = 2.00, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.01-3.95).

conclusionsConsidering the acceptable long-term results and the safety of these procedures, we believe that the endoscopic treatment should be offered as a first-line therapy for selected KT patients with US. Those with a short and duckbill-shaped stenosis diagnosed within 3 months of KT seem to be the best candidates.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationUreteral ObstructionConstriction, PathologicHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUrinary CatheterizationEndourologyKidney transplantationUreteral stenosis

Identifiers

PMID37340277
PMCPMC10352153
OpenAlexW4381332274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.