Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340259›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Jumping Through Hoops: Community Care Clinician and Staff Experiences Providing Primary Care to Rural Veterans.

Mary Patzel, Chrystal Barnes, NithyaPriya Ramalingam, Rose Gunn, Erin S Kenzie, Sarah S Ono, Melinda M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "Hit or Miss": Rural Veterans' Experiences Receiving Community Mental Health Care.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilization and Cost of Veterans Health Administration Referrals to Community Care-Based Physical Therapy.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary PatzelOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. patzel@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3338-2861
Chrystal BarnesOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
NithyaPriya RamalingamOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Rose GunnOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR, USA.
Erin S KenzieOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Sarah S OnoDepartment of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veteran Rural Health Resources Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2019 VA Maintaining Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act, or MISSION Act, aimed to improve rural veteran access to care by expanding coverage for services in the community. Increased access to clinicians outside the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) could benefit rural veterans, who often face obstacles obtaining VA care. This solution, however, relies on clinics willing to navigate VA administrative processes.

objectiveTo investigate the experiences rural, non-VA clinicians and staff have while providing care to rural veterans and inform challenges and opportunities for high-quality, equitable care access and delivery.

designPhenomenological qualitative study.

participantsNon-VA-affiliated primary care clinicians and staff in the Pacific Northwest. APPROACH: Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of eligible clinicians and staff between May and August 2020; data analyzed using thematic analysis. KEY

resultsWe interviewed 13 clinicians and staff and identified four themes and multiple challenges related to providing care for rural veterans: (1) Confusion, variability and delays for VA administrative processes, (2) clarifying responsibility for dual-user veteran care, (3) accessing and sharing medical records outside the VA, and (4) negotiating communication pathways between systems and clinicians. Informants reported using workarounds to combat challenges, including using trial and error to gain expertise in VA system navigation, relying on veterans to act as intermediaries to coordinate their care, and depending on individual VA employees to support provider-to-provider communication and share system knowledge. Informants expressed concerns that dual-user veterans were more likely to have duplication or gaps in services.

conclusionsFindings highlight the need to reduce the bureaucratic burden of interacting with the VA. Further work is needed to tailor structures to address challenges rural community providers experience and to identify strategies to reduce care fragmentation across VA and non-VA providers and encourage long-term commitment to care for veterans.

Indexed as

VeteransHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRural PopulationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsEquitable accessPrimary careRural health servicesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID37340259
PMCPMC10356713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.