Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340195›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

What Matters in Radiological Image Segmentation? Effect of Segmentation Errors on the Diagnostic Related Features.

Zihang Chen, Jiafei Chen, Jun Zhao, Bowei Liu, Shuanglong Jiang, Dongyue Si, Haiyan Ding, Yongjian Nian, Xiaochao Yang, Jingjing Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zihang Chen *Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jiafei Chen *The department of radiology, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Jun Zhao *The department of radiology, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Bowei LiuCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shuanglong JiangBio-Med Informatics Research Center & Clinical Research Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dongyue SiCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Haiyan DingCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yongjian NianSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaochao YangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jingjing XiaoBio-Med Informatics Research Center & Clinical Research Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China. shine636363@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5020-638X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation is a crucial step in extracting the medical image features for clinical diagnosis. Though multiple metrics have been proposed to evaluate the segmentation performance, there is no clear study on how or to what extent the segmentation errors will affect the diagnostic related features used in clinical practice. Therefore, we proposed a segmentation robustness plot (SRP) to build the link between segmentation errors and clinical acceptance, where relative area under the curve (R-AUC) was designed to help clinicians to identify the robust diagnostic related image features. In experiments, we first selected representative radiological series from time series (cardiac first-pass perfusion) and spatial series (T2 weighted images on brain tumors) of magnetic resonance images, respectively. Then, dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD), as the widely used evaluation metrics, were used to systematically control the degree of the segmentation errors. Finally, the differences between diagnostic related image features extracted from the ground truth and the derived segmentation were analyzed, using the statistical method large sample size T-test to calculate the corresponding p values. The results are denoted in the SRP, where the x-axis indicates the segmentation performance using the aforementioned evaluation metric, and the y-axis shows the severity of the corresponding feature changes, which are expressed in either the p values for a single case or the proportion of patients without significant change. The experimental results in SRP show that when DSC is above 0.95 and HD is below 3 mm, the segmentation errors will not change the features significantly in most cases. However, when segmentation gets worse, additional metrics are required for further analysis. In this way, the proposed SRP indicates the impact of the segmentation errors on the severity of the corresponding feature changes. By using SRP, one could easily define the acceptable segmentation errors in a challenge. Additionally, the R-AUC calculated from SRP provides an objective reference to help the selection of reliable features in image analysis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingHeartHumansRadiographyEvaluation metricsMedical image segmentationSegmentation robustness plot

Identifiers

PMID37340195
PMCPMC10501981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.