Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340193›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2024

Trends and patterns of antiseizure medication prescribing during pregnancy between 1995 and 2018 in the United Kingdom: A cohort study.

Paul Madley-Dowd, Jessica Rast, Viktor H Ahlqvist, Caichen Zhong, Florence Z Martin, Neil M Davies, Kristen Lyall, Craig Newschaffer, Torbjörn Tomson, Cecilia Magnusson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Lithium prescribing in the perinatal period: UK primary care cohort study.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paul Madley-DowdCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2932-9486
Jessica RastA.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-130X
Viktor H AhlqvistMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1383-3194
Caichen ZhongA.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1442-4133
Florence Z MartinCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6804-008X
Neil M DaviesMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-0508
Kristen LyallDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4633-0799
Craig NewschafferCollege of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
Torbjörn TomsonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0554-5352
Cecilia MagnussonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8567-6725
Dheeraj RaiCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7239-3523
Brian K LeeA.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-8034
Harriet ForbesCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-2212

Funding

Maternal epilepsy, antiepileptic drug use during pregnancy, and risk of autismR01NS107607 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, BRIAN KANE, MAGNUSSON, CECILIA · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/7Medical Research Council MR/S003940/1NIH HHS 1R01NS107607NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107607Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 218495/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine antiseizure medication (ASM) prescription during pregnancy.

designPopulation-based drug utilisation study.

settingUK primary and secondary care data, 1995-2018, from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD version. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: 752 112 completed pregnancies among women registered for a minimum of 12 months with an 'up to standard' general practice prior to the estimated start of pregnancy and for the duration of their pregnancy.

methodsWe described ASM prescription across the study period, overall and by ASM indication, examined patterns of prescription during pregnancy including continuous prescription and discontinuation, and used logistic regression to investigate factors associated with those ASM prescription patterns.

main outcome measuresPrescription of ASMs during pregnancy and discontinuation of ASMs before and during pregnancy.

resultsASM prescription during pregnancy increased from 0.6% of pregnancies in 1995 to 1.6% in 2018, driven largely by an increase in women with indications other than epilepsy. Epilepsy was an indication for 62.5% of pregnancies with an ASM prescription and non-epilepsy indications were present for 66.6%. Continuous prescription of ASMs during pregnancy was more common in women with epilepsy (64.3%) than in women with other indications (25.3%). Switching ASMs was infrequent (0.8% of ASM users). Factors associated with discontinuation included age ≥35, higher social deprivation, more frequent contact with the GP and being prescribed antidepressants or antipsychotics.

conclusionsASM prescription during pregnancy increased between 1995 and 2018 in the UK. Patterns of prescription around the pregnancy period vary by indication and are associated with several maternal characteristics.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsEpilepsyAnticonvulsantsCohort StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansPregnancyUnited KingdomAnticonvulsantsantiseizure medicationbipolar disorderepilepsyneuropathic painpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37340193
PMCPMC10730765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.