Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340186›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

The different clonal origins of metachronous and synchronous metastases.

Ofer N Gofrit, Ben Gofrit, Yuval Roditi, Aron Popovtzer, Steve Frank, Jacob Sosna, Marina Orevi, S Nahum Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ofer N GofritDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O.B 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel. ogofrit@gmail.com.
Ben GofritSchool of Engineering and Computer Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yuval RoditiSchool of Engineering and Computer Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Aron PopovtzerDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Steve FrankDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jacob SosnaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Marina OreviDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
S Nahum GoldbergDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastases are the leading cause of mortality in cancer patients. Linear and parallel are the two prominent models of metastatic progression. Metastases can be detected synchronously along with the primary tumor or metachronously, following treatment of localized disease. The aim of the study was to determine whether synchronous metastases (SM) and metachronous metastases (MM) differ only in lead-time or stem from different biological processes. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively studied the chest CTs of 791 patients inflicted by eleven malignancy types that were treated in our institution in the years 2010-2020. Patient's population included 396 with SM and 395 with MM. The diameter of 15,427 lung metastases was measured. Clonal origin was deduced from the linear/parallel ratio (LPR)-a computerized analysis of metastases diameters. LPR of  1 suggests pure linear dissemination and - 1 pure parallel.

resultsPatients with MM were significantly older (average of 62.9 vs 60.7 years, p = 0.02), and higher percentage of them were males (58.7% vs 51.1%, p = 0.03). Median overall survival of patients with MM and SM was remarkably similar (23 months and 26 months respectively, p = 0.774) when calculated from the time of metastases diagnosis. Parallel dissemination (LPR ≤ 0) was found in 35.4% of patients with MM compared to only 19.8% of the patients with SM (p < 0.00001).

conclusionPatients with SM and MM differ in demography and in clonal origin. Different therapeutic approaches may be considered in these two conditions.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateClonal originLinearMetachronous metastasesParallel ratioSynchronous metastases

Identifiers

PMID37340186
PMCPMC10465669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.