ArticleScientific reports2023
A screening method for cervical myelopathy using machine learning to analyze a drawing behavior.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Degenerative cervical myelopathy diagnosis: applicability of artificial intelligence-enhanced modalities in a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning based predictive analytics in cervical myelopathy - a scoping review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of cervical myelopathy (CM) is important for a favorable outcome, as its prognosis is poor when left untreated. We developed a screening method for CM using machine learning-based analysis of the drawing behavior of 38 patients with CM and 66 healthy volunteers. Using a stylus pen, the participants traced three different shapes displayed on a tablet device. During the tasks, writing behaviors, such as the coordinates, velocity, and pressure of the stylus tip, along with the drawing time, were recorded. From these data, features related to the drawing pressure, and time to trace each shape and combination of shapes were used as training data for the support vector machine, a machine learning algorithm. To evaluate the accuracy, a receiver operating characteristic curve was generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Models with triangular waveforms tended to be the most accurate. The best triangular wave model identified patients with and without CM with 76% sensitivity and 76% specificity, yielding an AUC of 0.80. Our model was able to classify CM with high accuracy and could be applied to the development of disease screening systems useful outside the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.