ArticleScientific reports2023
Modelling ligand depletion for simultaneous affinity and binding site quantification on cells and tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a GPCR-binding ligand screening method using real-time interaction analysis on live cells.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Real-Time Binding Kinetics of Small Molecules to CA IX in Live Suspension Cells Using SPR Microscopy.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Dual-Nuclide Biodistribution and Therapeutic Evaluation of a Novel Antibody-Based Radiopharmaceutical in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Xenografts.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantification of the number of targets in biological systems is an important parameter to assess the suitability of surface markers as targets for drugs, drug delivery and medical imaging. Likewise, quantifying the interaction with the target in terms of affinity and binding kinetics is essential during drug development. Commonly used approaches to quantify membrane antigens on live cells are based on manual saturation techniques that are labour-intensive, require careful calibration of the generated signal and do not quantify the binding rates. Here, we present how measuring interactions in real-time on live cells and tissue under ligand depletion conditions can be used to simultaneously quantify the kinetic binding parameters as well as the number of available binding sites in a biological system. Suitable assay design was explored with simulated data and feasibility of the method verified with experimental data for exemplary low molecular weight peptide and antibody radiotracers as well as fluorescent antibodies. In addition to revealing the number of accessible target sites and improving the accuracy of binding kinetics and affinities, the presented method does not require knowledge about the absolute signal generated per ligand molecule. This enables a simplified workflow for use with both radioligands and fluorescent binders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.