Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Climate resilience of dry season cereals in India.

Ruth DeFries, Shefang Liang, Ashwini Chhatre, Kyle Frankel Davis, Subimal Ghosh, Narasimha D Rao, Deepti Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sorghum as a monocot model for drought research.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruth DeFriesDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, 10027, USA. rd2402@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3332-4621
Shefang LiangDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, 10027, USA.
Ashwini ChhatreIndian School of Business, Hyderabad, 500111, India.
Kyle Frankel DavisDepartment of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4504-1407
Subimal GhoshDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, MH, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-1440
Narasimha D RaoYale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Deepti SinghSchool of the Environment, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, 98686, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India is the world's second largest producer of wheat, with more than 40% increase in production since 2000. Increasing temperatures raise concerns about wheat's sensitivity to heat. Traditionally-grown sorghum is an alternative rabi (winter season) cereal, but area under sorghum production has declined more than 20% since 2000. We examine sensitivity of wheat and sorghum yields to historical temperature and compare water requirements in districts where both cereals are cultivated. Wheat yields are sensitive to increases in maximum daily temperature in multiple stages of the growing season, while sorghum does not display the same sensitivity. Crop water requirements (mm) are 1.4 times greater for wheat than sorghum, mainly due to extension of its growing season into summer. However, water footprints (m

Indexed as

Edible GrainSorghumClimate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalIndiaSeasonsTriticumWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID37340018
PMCPMC10282032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.