Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339994›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects.

Violet Gibson, Eszter Somogyi, Iris Nomikou, Derry Taylor, Beatriz López, Innocent Chitalu Mulenga, Marina Davila-Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Violet GibsonPsychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK. violet.gibson@port.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-1127
Eszter SomogyiPsychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3935-3933
Iris NomikouPsychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-9974
Derry TaylorInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8559-7154
Beatriz LópezPsychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5621-6044
Innocent Chitalu MulengaChimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage Trust, Chingola, Zambia.
Marina Davila-RossPsychology Department, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5768-0217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protophones are considered to be precursors of speech. These vocalizations have been notably discussed in relation to toys and their importance for developing language skills. However, little is known about how natural objects, compared to artificial objects, may affect protophone production, an approach that could additionally help reconstruct how language evolved. In the current study, we examined protophone production in 58 infants (4-18 months) while interacting with their caregivers when using natural objects, household items, and toys. The infants were recorded in their home environment, in a rural area in Zambia. The results showed that the infants produced significantly fewer protophones when using natural objects than when using household items or toys. Importantly, this pattern was found only for the younger preverbal infants, and there was no indication in the data that the level of caregiver responsiveness differed with regard to the object type. Furthermore, the infants of the present work selected primarily the household items when exposed to both natural objects and household items. These findings suggest that natural objects are less likely to promote protophone production and, consequently, language skill development than artificial objects in preverbal infants, who seem to favor the latter, perhaps due to their features designed for specific functional purposes. Furthermore, these findings provide empirical evidence that the use of complex tools in social interactions may have helped to promote the evolution of language among hominins.

Indexed as

LanguageLanguage DevelopmentCognitionHumansInfantSocial InteractionSpeech

Identifiers

PMID37339994
PMCPMC10282070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.