Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339887›Full record

SynthesisNeurology2023

Economic Cost of Functional Neurologic Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Brian O'Mahony, Glenn Nielsen, Sallie Baxendale, Mark J Edwards, Mahinda Yogarajah

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidence and prevalence of functional neurological disorder: a systematic review.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The economic burden of functional neurological disorder.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian O'MahonyFrom the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (B.O.M.), King's College London; Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (G.N., M.J.E.), St. George's University of London; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (S.B., M.Y.), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Department of Neurology (S.B., M.Y.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery; Epilepsy Society (S.B., M.Y.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy; and Neurology Department (M.J.E.), Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St. George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Glenn NielsenFrom the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (B.O.M.), King's College London; Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (G.N., M.J.E.), St. George's University of London; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (S.B., M.Y.), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Department of Neurology (S.B., M.Y.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery; Epilepsy Society (S.B., M.Y.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy; and Neurology Department (M.J.E.), Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St. George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Sallie BaxendaleFrom the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (B.O.M.), King's College London; Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (G.N., M.J.E.), St. George's University of London; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (S.B., M.Y.), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Department of Neurology (S.B., M.Y.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery; Epilepsy Society (S.B., M.Y.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy; and Neurology Department (M.J.E.), Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St. George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Mark J EdwardsFrom the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (B.O.M.), King's College London; Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (G.N., M.J.E.), St. George's University of London; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (S.B., M.Y.), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Department of Neurology (S.B., M.Y.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery; Epilepsy Society (S.B., M.Y.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy; and Neurology Department (M.J.E.), Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St. George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Mahinda YogarajahFrom the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (B.O.M.), King's College London; Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (G.N., M.J.E.), St. George's University of London; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (S.B., M.Y.), University College London, Institute of Neurology; Department of Neurology (S.B., M.Y.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery; Epilepsy Society (S.B., M.Y.), Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy; and Neurology Department (M.J.E.), Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St. George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom. mahinda.yogarajah@nhs.net.
University College London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V037676/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesFunctional neurologic disorder (FND) represents genuine involuntary neurologic symptoms and signs including seizures, weakness, and sensory disturbance, which have characteristic clinical features, and represent a problem of voluntary control and perception despite normal basic structure of the nervous system. The historical view of FND as a diagnosis of exclusion can lead to unnecessary health care resource utilization and high direct and indirect economic costs. A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to assess these economic costs and to assess for any cost-effective treatments.

methodsWe searched electronic databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database of the University of York) for original, primary research publications between inception of the databases and April 8, 2022. A hand search of conference abstracts was also conducted. Key search terms included "functional neurologic disorder," "conversion disorder," and "functional seizures." Reviews, case reports, case series, and qualitative studies were excluded. We performed a descriptive and qualitative thematic analysis of the resulting studies.

resultsThe search resulted in a total of 3,244 studies. Sixteen studies were included after screening and exclusion of duplicates. These included the following: cost-of-illness (COI) studies that were conducted alongside cohort studies without intervention and those that included a comparator group, for example, another neurologic disorder (n = 4); COI studies that were conducted alongside cohort studies without intervention and those that did not include a comparator group (n = 4); economic evaluations of interventions that were either pre-post cohort studies (n = 6) or randomized controlled trials (n = 2). Of these, 5 studies assessed active interventions, and 3 studies assessed costs before and after a definitive diagnosis of FND. Studies showed an excess annual cost associated with FND (range $4,964-$86,722 2021 US dollars), which consisted of both direct and large indirect costs. Studies showed promise that interventions, including provision of a definitive diagnosis, could reduce this cost (range 9%-90.7%). No cost-effective treatments were identified. Study comparison was limited by study design and location heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: FND is associated with a significant use of health care resources, resulting in economic costs to both the patient and the taxpayer and intangible losses. Interventions, including accurate diagnosis, seem to offer an avenue toward reducing these costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsNervous System DiseasesConversion DisorderCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansSeizures

Identifiers

PMID37339887
PMCPMC10351557
OpenAlexW4381330094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.