Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339877›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Diversity of Ganglion Cell Responses to Saccade-Like Image Shifts in the Primate Retina.

Steffen Krüppel, Mohammad H Khani, Dimokratis Karamanlis, Yunus C Erol, Sören J Zapp, Matthias Mietsch, Dario A Protti, Fernando Rozenblit, Tim Gollisch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steffen KrüppelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Mohammad H KhaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Dimokratis KaramanlisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Yunus C ErolDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Sören J ZappDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-1663
Matthias MietschLaboratory Animal Science Unit, German Primate Center, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Dario A ProttiSchool of Medical Sciences (Neuroscience), The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2554-6419
Fernando RozenblitDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Tim GollischDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany tim.gollisch@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-533X
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen · DEGerman Primate Center · DEThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccades are a fundamental part of natural vision. They interrupt fixations of the visual gaze and rapidly shift the image that falls onto the retina. These stimulus dynamics can cause activation or suppression of different retinal ganglion cells, but how they affect the encoding of visual information in different types of ganglion cells is largely unknown. Here, we recorded spiking responses to saccade-like shifts of luminance gratings from ganglion cells in isolated marmoset retinas and investigated how the activity depended on the combination of presaccadic and postsaccadic images. All identified cell types, On and Off parasol and midget cells, as well as a type of Large Off cells, displayed distinct response patterns, including particular sensitivity to either the presaccadic or the postsaccadic image or combinations thereof. In addition, Off parasol and Large Off cells, but not On cells, showed pronounced sensitivity to whether the image changed across the transition. Stimulus sensitivity of On cells could be explained based on their responses to step changes in light intensity, whereas Off cells, in particular, parasol and the Large Off cells, seem to be affected by additional interactions that are not triggered during simple light-intensity flashes. Together, our data show that ganglion cells in the primate retina are sensitive to different combinations of presaccadic and postsaccadic visual stimuli. This contributes to the functional diversity of the output signals of the retina and to asymmetries between On and Off pathways and provides evidence of signal processing beyond what is triggered by isolated steps in light intensity.

Indexed as

CallithrixSaccadesAnimalsEye MovementsPhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Ganglion Cellsencodingganglion cellsmodelprimate retinasaccadespikes

Identifiers

PMID37339877
PMCPMC10359029
OpenAlexW4381327921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.