Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339791›Full record

Observational studyCMAJ open

Opioid-related emergency department visits and deaths after a harm-reduction intervention: a retrospective observational cohort time series analysis.

Matthew E M Yeung, Chel Hee Lee, Riley Hartmann, Eddy Lang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Supervised consumption sites and population-level overdose mortality: a systematic review of recent evidence, 2016-2024.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew E M YeungDepartments of Emergency Medicine (Yeung, Lang) and Critical Care Medicine (Lee), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hartmann), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. Matthew.yeung1@ucalgary.ca.
Chel Hee LeeDepartments of Emergency Medicine (Yeung, Lang) and Critical Care Medicine (Lee), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hartmann), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
Riley HartmannDepartments of Emergency Medicine (Yeung, Lang) and Critical Care Medicine (Lee), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hartmann), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
Eddy LangDepartments of Emergency Medicine (Yeung, Lang) and Critical Care Medicine (Lee), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hartmann), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, there has been little research on the effect of safe consumption site and community-based naloxone programs on regional opioid-related emergency department visits and deaths. We sought to determine the impact of these interventions on regional opioid-related emergency department visit and death rates in the province of Alberta.

methodsWe used a retrospective observational design, via interrupted time series analysis, to assess municipal opioid-related emergency department visit volume and opioid-related deaths (defined by poisoning and opioid use disorder). We compared rates before and after program implementation in individual Alberta municipalities and province-wide after safe consumption site (March 2018 to October 2018) and community-based naloxone (January 2016) program implementation.

resultsA total of 24 107 emergency department visits and 2413 deaths were included in the study. After safe consumption site opening, we saw decreased opioid-related emergency department visits in Calgary (level change -22.7 [-20%] visits per month, 95% confidence interval [CI] -29.7 to -15.8) and Lethbridge (level change -8.8 [-50%] visits per month, 95% CI -11.7 to -5.9), and decreased deaths in Edmonton (level change -5.9 [-55%] deaths per month, 95% CI -8.9 to -2.9). We observed increased emergency department visits after community-based naloxone program implementation in urban Alberta (level change 38.9 [46%] visits, 95% CI 33.3 to 44.4). We also observed an increase in urban opioid-related deaths (level change 9.1 [40%] deaths, 95% CI 6.7 to 11.5).

interpretationThe results of this study suggest differences exist between municipalities employing similar interventions. Our results also suggest contextual variation; for example, illicit drug supply toxicity may modify the ability of a community-based naloxone program to prevent opioid overdose without a thorough public health response.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseEmergency Service, HospitalHumansNaloxoneRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxone

Identifiers

PMID37339791
PMCPMC10287102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.