Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339762›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023

Health, Economic, and Social Impacts of Substandard and Falsified Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Approaches.

Raimat Korede Salami, Sara Valente de Almeida, Adrian Gheorghe, Sarah Njenga, Wnurinham Silva, Katharina Hauck

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raimat Korede SalamiDepartment of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sara Valente de AlmeidaDepartment of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian GheorgheDepartment of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah NjengaDepartment of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wnurinham SilvaDepartment of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katharina HauckDepartment of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/X020258/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the adverse health, economic, and social impacts of substandard and falsified medicines (SFMs). This systematic review aimed to identify the methods used in studies to measure the impact of SFMs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), summarize their findings, and identify gaps in the reviewed literature. A search of eight databases for published papers, and a manual search of references in the relevant literature were conducted using synonyms of SFMs and LMICs. Studies in the English language that estimated the health, social, or economic impacts of SFMs in LMICs published before June 17, 2022 were considered eligible. Search results generated 1,078 articles, and 11 studies were included after screening and quality assessment. All included studies focused on countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Six studies used the Substandard and Falsified Antimalarials Research Impact model to estimate the impact of SFMs. This model is an important contribution. However, it is technically challenging and data demanding, which poses challenges to its adoption by national academics and policymakers alike. The included studies estimate that substandard and falsified antimalarial medicines can account from 10% to ∼40% of total annual malaria costs, and SFMs affect rural and poor populations disproportionately. Evidence on the impact of SFMs is limited in general and nonexistent regarding social outcomes. Further research needs to focus on practical methods that can serve local authorities without major investments in terms of technical capacity and data collection.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsCounterfeit DrugsMalariaDeveloping CountriesHumansSocial ChangeAntimalarialsCounterfeit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID37339762
PMCPMC10397424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.