ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023
Detection of Substandard and Falsified Antibiotics Sold in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Using Validated HPLC and UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Methods.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptions and Acceptability ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Healthcare workers´ perspectives on antibiotic utilization in children under five years of age in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The access to afford safe, effective, and genuine medications is a major challenge for people in low- to middle-income countries. This study aimed at developing and validating simple, accurate, and inexpensive analytical liquid chromatography and ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometric methods to ensure quality control of antibiotics sold in formal and informal pharmaceutical markets. It focused on four antibiotics (azithromycin [AZT], cefadroxil [CFD], cefixime [CFX], and erythromycin [ERH]) used to treat infectious diseases in the region of Haut-Katanga in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The total error strategy (accuracy profile) matching with the validation requirements of International Council on Harmonization was used for the validation. The validation results showed that three analytical methods of AZT, CFD, and ERH were validated according to the accuracy profile obtained, whereas the proposed method of CFX was not validated. Therefore, the United State Pharmacopoeia method permitted to quantify CFX samples. The dosage intervals ranged from 25 to 75 µg/mL for CFD, from 750 to 1,500 µg/mL for AZT, and from 500 to 750 µg/mL for ERH. The application of the validated method to samples collected (N = 95) allowed the detection of 25% substandard antibiotics with a rate of poor quality much higher in the informal circuit compared with the formal one (54% versus 11%; P < 0.05). The routine application of these methods will strengthen the quality control of drugs marketed in DRC. This study gives evidence for the availability of poor-quality antibiotics in the country, requiring the immediate attention of the national medicine regulatory authority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.