Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339748›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Partial protection from fluctuating selection leads to evolution towards wider population size fluctuation and a novel mechanism of balancing selection.

Yuseob Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuseob KimDivision of EcoScience and Department of Life Science, Ewha Womans University, Ewhayeodae-gil 52, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-6147
Ewha Womans University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a population is partially protected from fluctuating selection, as when a seed bank is present, variance in fitness will be reduced and reproductive success of the population will be promoted. This study further investigates the effect of such a 'refuge' from fluctuating selection using a mathematical model that couples demographic and evolutionary dynamics. While alleles that cause smaller fluctuations in population density should be positively selected according to classical theoretic predictions, this study finds the opposite: alleles that increase the amplitude of population size fluctuation are positively selected if population density is weakly regulated. Under strong density regulation with a constant carrying capacity, long-term maintenance of polymorphism caused by the storage effect emerges. However, if the carrying capacity of the population is oscillating, mutant alleles whose fitness fluctuates in the same direction as population size are positively selected, eventually reaching fixation or intermediate frequencies that oscillate over time. This oscillatory polymorphism, which requires fitness fluctuations that can arise with simple trade-offs in life-history traits, is a novel form of balancing selection. These results highlight the importance of allowing joint demographic and population genetic changes in models, the failure of which prevents the discovery of novel eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticBiological EvolutionModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticPopulation Densityabsolute fitnessbalancing selectionfluctuating selectionpopulation sizestorage effect

Identifiers

PMID37339748
PMCPMC10281806
OpenAlexW4381330024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.