Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339628›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023

Kinematic priming of action predictions.

Eugenio Scaliti, Kiri Pullar, Giulia Borghini, Andrea Cavallo, Stefano Panzeri, Cristina Becchio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Action prediction in psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eugenio ScalitiCenter for Human Technologies, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Enrico Melen, 83, 16152 Genova, Italy; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Kiri PullarCenter for Human Technologies, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Enrico Melen, 83, 16152 Genova, Italy.
Giulia BorghiniCenter for Human Technologies, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Enrico Melen, 83, 16152 Genova, Italy.
Andrea CavalloCenter for Human Technologies, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Enrico Melen, 83, 16152 Genova, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Giuseppe Verdi, 10, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Stefano PanzeriCenter for Human Technologies, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Enrico Melen, 83, 16152 Genova, Italy; Department of Excellence for Neural Information Processing, Center for Molecular Neurobiology (ZMNH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Falkenried 94, 20251 Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: s.panzeri@uke.de.
Cristina BecchioCenter for Human Technologies, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Enrico Melen, 83, 16152 Genova, Italy; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: c.becchio@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to anticipate what others will do next is crucial for navigating social, interactive environments. Here, we develop an experimental and analytical framework to measure the implicit readout of prospective intention information from movement kinematics. Using a primed action categorization task, we first demonstrate implicit access to intention information by establishing a novel form of priming, which we term kinematic priming: subtle differences in movement kinematics prime action prediction. Next, using data collected from the same participants in a forced-choice intention discrimination task 1 h later, we quantify single-trial intention readout-the amount of intention information read by individual perceivers in individual kinematic primes-and assess whether it can be used to predict the amount of kinematic priming. We demonstrate that the amount of kinematic priming, as indexed by both response times (RTs) and initial fixations to a given probe, is directly proportional to the amount of intention information read by the individual perceiver at the single-trial level. These results demonstrate that human perceivers have rapid, implicit access to intention information encoded in movement kinematics and highlight the potential of our approach to reveal the computations that permit the readout of this information with single-subject, single-trial resolution.

Indexed as

IntentionMovementBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansProspective StudiesReaction Timeintentionkinematic encodingkinematic primingkinematic readoutprospective information

Identifiers

PMID37339628
PMCPMC10357321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.