Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37339396›Full record

Trial reportMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2023

Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder.

Masakazu Terauchi, Jocelyn Y Cheng, Jane Yardley, Kate Pinner, Margaret Moline, Manoj Malhotra, Kanako Inabe, Maika Nishida, Elizabeth Pappadopulos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06928766 (Effects of Eszopiclone and Lemborexant in People With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06928766 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Eszopiclone and Lemborexant in People With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) With a Low Arousal Threshold Who Have Difficulty Maintaining or Falling Asleep (ELOSA): A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised, Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFlinders UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled15ConditionsOSA - Obstructive Sleep ApneaArmsEszopiclone 3 mg, Placebo, Lemborexant 10mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Masakazu TerauchiFrom the Department of Women's Health, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Jocelyn Y ChengEisai Inc, Nutley, NJ.
Jane YardleyEisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
Kate PinnerEisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
Margaret MolineEisai Inc, Nutley, NJ.
Manoj MalhotraFormerly Eisai Inc, Nutley, NJ.
Kanako InabeFormerly Eisai Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Maika NishidaFormerly Eisai Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Elizabeth PappadopulosEisai Inc, Nutley, NJ.
Eisai (United States) · USEisai (United Kingdom) · GBTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInsomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2).

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 mo) study of adults with insomnia disorder ( N = 949). During treatment period 1 (TP1), participants received PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). During TP2 (second 6 mo), LEM participants continued their assigned dose; PBO participants were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10. Assessments included patient-reported sleep- and fatigue-related measures and treatment-emergent adverse events.

resultsThe midlife female subgroup comprised 280 of 949 participants (TP1: PBO, n = 90 of 318 [28.3%]; LEM5, n = 82 of 316 [25.9%]; LEM10, n = 108 of 315 [34.3%]). At 6 months, median changes from baseline in subjective sleep-onset latency (in minutes) were -17.9, -20.7, and - 30.4 for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5, P = not significant; LEM10, P = 0.0310). At 6 months, mean changes from baseline in subjective wake after sleep onset (in minutes) were -37.0 (59.6), -50.1 (74.5), and -54.5 (65.4) for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5 and LEM10, P = not significant), with benefits sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases from baseline (improvement) in Insomnia Severity Index total score and Fatigue Severity Scale total score were seen with LEM versus PBO at 6 months; benefits continued through 12 months. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

conclusionsConsistent with the total population, subjective sleep parameters improved, and improvement was sustained over time in midlife women. LEM was well tolerated, suggesting that LEM may be a potential treatment option for midlife women with insomnia.

Indexed as

PyridinesPyrimidinesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMenopauseMiddle AgedPerimenopauseTreatment OutcomelemborexantPyridinesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID37339396
PMCPMC10389212
OpenAlexW4381328998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.