Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37338999›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2023

Estimating the Effect of a Treatment When There Is Nonadherence in a Trial.

David B Richardson, Oliver Dukes, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David B Richardson
Oliver Dukes
Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen

Funding

Novel Designs and Methods to Remove Hidden Confounding Bias in Health SciencesR01AG065276 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: Models for Policy MakingR01OH011409 · OH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID B · 2017 to 2021
$814k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065276NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized trials offer a powerful strategy for estimating the effect of a treatment on an outcome. However, interpretation of trial results can be complicated when study subjects do not take the treatment to which they were assigned; this is referred to as nonadherence. Prior authors have described instrumental variable approaches to analyze trial data with nonadherence; under their approaches, the initial assignment to treatment is used as an instrument. However, their approaches require the assumption that initial assignment to treatment has no direct effect on the outcome except via the actual treatment received (i.e., the exclusion restriction), which may be implausible. We propose an approach to identification of a causal effect of treatment in a trial with 1-sided nonadherence without assuming exclusion restriction. The proposed approach leverages the study subjects initially assigned to control status as an unexposed reference population; we then employ a bespoke instrumental variable analysis, where the key assumption is "partial exchangeability" of the association between a covariate and an outcome in the treatment and control arms. We provide a formal description of the conditions for identification of causal effects, illustrate the method using simulations, and provide an empirical application.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient ComplianceCausalityHumansinstrumental variablesnonadherencenoncompliancerandomized trials

Identifiers

PMID37338999
PMCPMC11043915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.