Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37338981›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners.

Anastasia G Sares, Annie C Gilbert, Yue Zhang, Maria Iordanov, Alexandre Lehmann, Mickael L D Deroche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anastasia G SaresDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1440-2639
Annie C GilbertCentre for Research in Brain, Language, and Music, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Yue ZhangOticon Medical, Marseille, France.
Maria IordanovDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandre LehmannCentre for Research in Brain, Language, and Music, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mickael L D DerocheDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-2249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory memory is an important everyday skill evaluated more and more frequently in clinical settings as there is recently a greater recognition of the cost of hearing loss to cognitive systems. Testing often involves reading a list of unrelated items aloud; but prosodic variations in pitch and timing across the list can affect the number of items remembered. Here, we ran a series of online studies on normally-hearing participants to provide normative data (with a larger and more diverse population than the typical student sample) on a novel protocol characterizing the effects of suprasegmental properties in speech, namely investigating pitch patterns, fast and slow pacing, and interactions between pitch and time grouping. In addition to free recall, and in line with our desire to work eventually with individuals exhibiting more limited cognitive capacity, we included a cued recall task to help participants recover specifically the words forgotten during the free recall part. We replicated key findings from previous research, demonstrating the benefits of slower pacing and of grouping on free recall. However, only slower pacing led to better performance on cued recall, indicating that grouping effects may decay surprisingly fast (over a matter of one minute) compared to the effect of slowed pacing. These results provide a benchmark for future comparisons of short-term recall performance in hearing-impaired listeners and users of cochlear implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsHearing LossSpeech PerceptionCuesHearingHumanschunkingmelodyprosodyshort-term memoryspeech

Identifiers

PMID37338981
PMCPMC10286184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.