Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37338974›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2023

Prediction of Outcomes After Heart Transplantation in Pediatric Patients Using National Registry Data: Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches.

Michael O Killian, Shubo Tian, Aiwen Xing, Dana Hughes, Dipankar Gupta, Xiaoyu Wang, Zhe He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Explainable AI: Ethical Frameworks, Bias, and the Necessity for Benchmarks.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael O Killian *College of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-9007
Shubo Tian *Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6415-1439
Aiwen XingDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-7025
Dana HughesCollege of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4500-181X
Dipankar GuptaCongenital Heart Center, Shands Children's Hospital, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-7143
Xiaoyu WangDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-3084
Zhe He *School of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3608-0244
Florida State University · USUF Health Shands Hospital · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Prediction of Health Outcomes and Adverse Events in Pediatric Organ Transplantation in FloridaR21LM013911 · NLM · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, ZHE, KILLIAN, MICHAEL · 2022 to 2023
$395k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prediction of posttransplant health outcomes for pediatric heart transplantation is critical for risk stratification and high-quality posttransplant care.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the use of machine learning (ML) models to predict rejection and mortality for pediatric heart transplant recipients.

methodsVarious ML models were used to predict rejection and mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplantation in pediatric heart transplant recipients using United Network for Organ Sharing data from 1987 to 2019. The variables used for predicting posttransplant outcomes included donor and recipient as well as medical and social factors. We evaluated 7 ML models-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest (RF), stochastic gradient descent, multilayer perceptron, and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost)-as well as a deep learning model with 2 hidden layers with 100 neurons and a rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function followed by batch normalization for each and a classification head with a softmax activation function. We used 10-fold cross-validation to evaluate model performance. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were calculated to estimate the importance of each variable for prediction.

resultsRF and AdaBoost models were the best-performing algorithms for different prediction windows across outcomes. RF outperformed other ML algorithms in predicting 5 of the 6 outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.664 and 0.706 for 1-year and 3-year rejection, respectively, and AUROC 0.697, 0.758, and 0.763 for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality, respectively). AdaBoost achieved the best performance for prediction of 5-year rejection (AUROC 0.705).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the comparative utility of ML approaches for modeling posttransplant health outcomes using registry data. ML approaches can identify unique risk factors and their complex relationship with outcomes, thereby identifying patients considered to be at risk and informing the transplant community about the potential of these innovative approaches to improve pediatric care after heart transplantation. Future studies are required to translate the information derived from prediction models to optimize counseling, clinical care, and decision-making within pediatric organ transplant centers.

Indexed as

explainable artificial intelligencemachine learningmortalityorgan rejectionorgan transplantationoutcome predictionpediatricsUnited Network for Organ Sharing

Identifiers

PMID37338974
PMCPMC10334720
OpenAlexW4381309868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.