ArticleJAMA network open2023
Parental Preferences for Mental Health Screening of Youths From a Multinational Survey.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A personal sensing technology enabled service versus a digital psychoeducation control for primary care patients with depression and anxiety: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Parental willingness and influencing factors for school-based mental health screening in Eastern China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- General and Behavioral Health Screening Under EPSDT for Adolescents in New York Medicaid Managed Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Physician Preferences for Universal Routine Depression Screening for Adolescents in Primary Care.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Self-reported psychological distress in childhood and mental health-related hospital attendance among young adults: a 12-year data linkage cohort study from England.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
- Pre-implementation determinants for digital mental health integration in Chicago pediatric primary care.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- The Development of a Brief but Comprehensive Therapeutic Assessment Protocol for the Screening and Support of Youth in the Community to Address the Youth Mental Health Crisis.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Potential mental health-related harms associated with the universal screening of anxiety and depressive symptoms in Australian secondary schools.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2024Article
- Improving Diagnostic Strategies for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Advice for the Clinician.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024Review
- Anxiety and Depression in Today's Youth: A Current Look into Assessment and Treatment.Missouri medicineReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Screening youths for mental disorders may assist in prevention, promote early identification, and be associated with reduced related lifetime impairment and distress. Objective: To assess parents' and caregivers' comfort with and preferences for pediatric mental health screening and factors associated with these preferences. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study used an online survey available from July 11 to 14, 2021, through Prolific Academic. Analyses were conducted from November 2021 to November 2022. The survey was administered to English-speaking parents and caregivers in the US, UK, Canada, and 16 other countries who were aged 21 years or older and had at least 1 child aged 5 to 21 years living at home. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were parental preferences regarding content, implementation, and review of the findings of pediatric mental health screening. Parental comfort with screening topics was reported on a 6-point Likert scale with 6 indicating highest comfort. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with parental comfort levels. Results: Of 1200 survey responses requested, data were collected from 1136 participants (94.7%). The final sample meeting the inclusion criteria comprised 972 parents and caregivers aged 21 to 65 years (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [6.9] years; 606 [62.3%] female). A total of 631 participants (64.9%) supported annual mental health screening for their child, and 872 (89.7%) preferred reviewing the screening results with professional staff (eg, physicians). Participants reported significantly decreased comfort with child self-report compared with parent-report screening assessments (b = -0.278; SE = 0.009; P < .001), although they were generally comfortable with both options. Despite slight variations based on country of residence, screening topic, and child's age, participants were generally comfortable discussing all 21 screening topics on the survey. The greatest comfort was with sleep problems (mean [SE] score, 5.30 [0.03]); the least comfort was with firearms (mean [SE] score, 4.71 [0.05]), gender identity (mean [SE] score, 4.68 [0.05]), suicidality (mean [SE] score, 4.62 [0.05]), and substance use or abuse (mean [SE] score, 4.78 [0.05]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of parents and caregivers, parent-reported and child self-reported mental health screening in primary care settings was supported by the majority of the sample, although comfort levels differed according to various factors (eg, screening topic). Participants preferred to discuss screening results with professional health care staff. In addition to parental need for expert guidance, the study findings highlight the growing awareness of child mental health needs and the importance of addressing mental health concerns early via regular mental health screenings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.