Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37338628›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Climate disasters and oncology care: a systematic review of effects on patients, healthcare professionals, and health systems.

Pamela Ginex, Erin Dickman, Milagros R Elia, Darcy Burbage, Ryne Wilson, Jessica A Koos, Kapeena Sivakumaran, Rebecca L Morgan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plant-based diets and urological health.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela GinexStony Brook University School of Nursing, Stony Brook, NY, USA. Pamela.ginex@stonybrookmedicine.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3878-4835
Erin DickmanOncology Clinical Specialist, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8014-5116
Milagros R EliaM. Elia Nature-Based Healthcare Solutions, Mahopac, NY, USA.
Darcy BurbageOncology Clinical Nurse Specialist, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0231-7362
Ryne WilsonUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7504-3337
Jessica A KoosStony Brook University Health Sciences Library, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4128-3791
Kapeena SivakumaranEvidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA.
Rebecca L MorganEvidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USMedical Oncology Hematology Consultants · USOncology Nursing Society · USStony Brook School · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClimate disasters have devastating effects on communities and society that encompass all aspects of daily life, including healthcare. Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable when disaster strikes. As the number and intensity of disasters increases, it is important to understand the effects across the cancer care continuum. This systematic review investigates the effect of climate disasters on patients, the oncology healthcare workforce, and healthcare systems.

methodsA medical librarian conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from January 1, 2016, through May 11, 2022. Eligible studies included any published report on a climate disaster globally reporting on patient-, oncology healthcare workforce-, or healthcare systems-level outcomes. Study quality was assessed, and findings were narratively synthesized, given the diversity of reported evidence.

resultsThe literature search identified 3618 records, of which 46 publications were eligible for inclusion. The most frequent climate disaster was hurricanes (N = 27) followed by tsunami (N = 10). Eighteen publications were from disasters that occurred in the mainland USA with 13 from Japan and 12 from Puerto Rico. Patient-level outcomes included treatment interruptions and inability to communicate with the healthcare team. At the workforce level, findings included distressed clinicians caring for others when their own lives have been affected by a disaster along with lack of disaster preparedness training. Health systems reported closures or shifting services post-disaster and a need to have improved emergency response plans.

conclusionResponse to climate disasters necessitates a holistic approach at the patient, workforce, and health systems levels. Specifically, interventions should focus on mitigating interruptions in care for patients, advanced coordination and planning for workforce and health systems, and contingency planning for allocation of resources by health systems.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningDisastersContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareHumansWorkforceCancer careClimate changeClimate disasterEmergency preparedness

Identifiers

PMID37338628
OpenAlexW4381309823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.