Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37338270›Full record

ArticlemSystems2023

Inferring microbial co-occurrence networks from amplicon data: a systematic evaluation.

Dileep Kishore, Gabriel Birzu, Zhenjun Hu, Charles DeLisi, Kirill S Korolev, Daniel Segrè

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dileep KishoreBioinformatics Program, Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gabriel BirzuDepartment of Physics, Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhenjun HuBioinformatics Program, Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Charles DeLisiBioinformatics Program, Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kirill S KorolevBioinformatics Program, Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel SegrèBioinformatics Program, Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4859-1914

Funding

Identifying protective omics profiles in centenarians and translating these into preventive and therapeutic strategiesUH2AG064704 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2019 to 2021
$9.4M
Cultivation, Nature, Ecology and Pathogenicity of the Uncultivable Oral MicrobiomR01DE024468 · NIDCR · ADA FORSYTH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ALM, ERIC JOHN, DEWHIRST, FLOYD E · 2014 to 2018
$7.3M
A platform for mining, visualization and design of microbial interaction networksR01GM121950 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DELISI, CHARLES, HU, ZHENJUN · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
Spatio-temporal mechanistic modeling of whole-cell tumor metabolismR21CA279630 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DUKOVSKI, ILIJA, KOROLEV, KIRILL SERGEEVICH · 2023 to 2024
$413k
Microbiome-based biomarkers and models of lung cancer development and treatmentR21CA260382 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JOHNSON, WILLIAM EVAN, SEGRE, DANIEL · 2022 to 2023
$377k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA260382NCI NIH HHS R21 CA279630NIA NIH HHS UH2 AG064704NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024468NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes commonly organize into communities consisting of hundreds of species involved in complex interactions with each other. 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) amplicon profiling provides snapshots that reveal the phylogenies and abundance profiles of these microbial communities. These snapshots, when collected from multiple samples, can reveal the co-occurrence of microbes, providing a glimpse into the network of associations in these communities. However, the inference of networks from 16S data involves numerous steps, each requiring specific tools and parameter choices. Moreover, the extent to which these steps affect the final network is still unclear. In this study, we perform a meticulous analysis of each step of a pipeline that can convert 16S sequencing data into a network of microbial associations. Through this process, we map how different choices of algorithms and parameters affect the co-occurrence network and identify the steps that contribute substantially to the variance. We further determine the tools and parameters that generate robust co-occurrence networks and develop consensus network algorithms based on benchmarks with mock and synthetic data sets. The Microbial Co-occurrence Network Explorer, or MiCoNE (available at https://github.com/segrelab/MiCoNE) follows these default tools and parameters and can help explore the outcome of these combinations of choices on the inferred networks. We envisage that this pipeline could be used for integrating multiple data sets and generating comparative analyses and consensus networks that can guide our understanding of microbial community assembly in different biomes. IMPORTANCE Mapping the interrelationships between different species in a microbial community is important for understanding and controlling their structure and function. The surge in the high-throughput sequencing of microbial communities has led to the creation of thousands of data sets containing information about microbial abundances. These abundances can be transformed into co-occurrence networks, providing a glimpse into the associations within microbiomes. However, processing these data sets to obtain co-occurrence information relies on several complex steps, each of which involves numerous choices of tools and corresponding parameters. These multiple options pose questions about the robustness and uniqueness of the inferred networks. In this study, we address this workflow and provide a systematic analysis of how these choices of tools affect the final network and guidelines on appropriate tool selection for a particular data set. We also develop a consensus network algorithm that helps generate more robust co-occurrence networks based on benchmark synthetic data sets.

Indexed as

Microbial ConsortiaMicrobiotaAlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAconsensus algorithmco-occurrencecorrelationsdenoisinginteractionMicrobiomenetwork inferencenetworksnextflowpipelineQIIME2taxonomy

Identifiers

PMID37338270
PMCPMC10469762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.