ArticleThe oncologist2023
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Senaparib, a Novel PARP1/2 Inhibitor, in Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Trial.
Article in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03508011 (A Phase I, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of IMP4297 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of IMP4297 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Senaparib as first-line maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.Nature medicine · 2024Trial
- Clinical application of PARP inhibitors and emerging strategies to overcome resistance: a pan-cancer perspective.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- A PBPK-VBE approach for bioequivalence extrapolation of senaparib capsule strengths in the context of nonlinear pharmacokinetics: bridging from the clinical starting dose to the linear pharmacokinetic range.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Senaparib: First Approval.Drugs · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSenaparib, a novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical studies. This phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation/-expansion study explored the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of senaparib in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND
methodsAdults with advanced solid tumors who had failed ³1 line of prior systemic treatment were enrolled. Senaparib (once daily [QD]) dose was escalated from 2 mg until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) using a modified 3 + 3 design. Dose expansion included: dose groups with ≥1 objective response and one dose higher, as well as those at the MTD/RP2D. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and determine the MTD and/or RP2D of senaparib.
resultsFifty-seven patients were enrolled across 10 dose groups (2-120 mg QD, and 50 mg twice daily). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common senaparib-related adverse events were anemia (80.9%), white blood cell count decreased (43.9%), platelet count decreased (28.1%), and asthenia (26.3%). Senaparib exposure increased dose proportionately at 2-80 mg; absorption saturated at 80-120 mg. Senaparib accumulation was minimal after repeated QD administration (accumulation ratio=1.1-1.5). The objective response rate was 22.7% (n=10/44) overall (all partial responses) and 26.9% (n=7/26) for patients harboring BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Disease control rates were 63.6% and 73.1%, respectively.
conclusionsSenaparib was well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. The RP2D for this clinical study in China was identified as 100 mg QD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03508011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.