ArticleJournal of pain research2023
Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN) for Chronic Pain at a Single Institution: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of naltrexone in the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review.Pain management · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone in Women With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A 12-Month Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Single-Centre Clinical Trial (INNOVA Study).European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Low-Dose Naltrexone: What is the Evidence? A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Bertolotti's Syndrome: Etiology, Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Cureus · 2026Review
- Low-Dose Naltrexone in Chronic Pain Management: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Low dose naltrexone for fibromyalgia: case series demonstrating pain relief and other health benefits.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Present and Future of Pain Management in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Low Dose Naltrexone to Treat Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study of One Pain Physician's Practice.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Synergistic Epistasis and Systems Biology Approaches to Uncover a Pharmacogenomic Map Linked to Pain, Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulating Agents (PAIma) in a Healthy Cohort.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Article
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Transgluteal Pudendal Nerve Block for Pudendal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Chronic pain in the elderly: Exploring cellular and molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in aging · 2024Review
- Effective Doses of Low-Dose Naltrexone for Chronic Pain - An Observational Study.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has increased in popularity as a non-opioid medication that may decrease chronic pain symptoms. LDN is most commonly used to treat fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and painful diabetic neuropathy. Other studies suggest that LDN provides general symptom reduction in inflammatory conditions such as Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis. We reviewed our experience with patients to whom we have prescribed LDN to see what types of painful conditions were most responsive to LDN in our patient population. Patients and Methods: Charts from patients who came to the Pain Center between 2014 and 2021 were reviewed. Results: Of the n = 137 patients who were prescribed LDN, 44% had no evidence of ever filling the prescription, and 4.4% of the responses were not charted. Of the remaining who took LDN (n = 70), 64% had some relief and were designated as 'Responders'. The most common pain diagnosis was neuropathic pain which, when added to the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome, accounted for 51% of responders to LDN. Patients who experienced greater than 50% pain relief from LDN were more likely to have the diagnosis of neuropathic pain or complex regional pain syndrome (p = 0.038, Fisher's Exact Test). There was a significant difference in the diagnosis of patients who responded to LDN. Patients with spondylosis were much less likely to respond to LDN when compared with other diagnoses (p = 0.00435, Chi-Square Test). Conclusion: Patients with all types of neuropathic pain, including CRPS, were significantly more likely to have pain relief from LDN than patients with spondylosis (p=0.018). The diagnosis of spondylosis was more often associated with a lack of response to LDN than any other diagnosis. Patients may need to have a trial of several weeks before analgesic effects are seen with LDN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.