Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337585›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2023

Habitat-use of the vulnerable Atlantic Nurse Shark: a review.

Vanessa Brito Bettcher, Ana Clara Sampaio Franco, Luciano Neves Dos Santos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vanessa Brito BettcherTheoretical and Applied Ichthyology Lab (LICTA), Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Clara Sampaio FrancoTheoretical and Applied Ichthyology Lab (LICTA), Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1572-3645
Luciano Neves Dos SantosTheoretical and Applied Ichthyology Lab (LICTA), Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-5672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities have led to the loss of critical habitats for aquatic species at such an accelerated rate that habitat modification is considered a leading threat to biodiversity. Sharks and rays are considered the second most threatened group of vertebrates that have also suffered from habitat loss, especially in nursery grounds and reef-associated species. In this sense, actions toward the conservation of critical grounds for species survival are urgently needed, especially for those threatened with extinction. This study aimed to gather and provide information on the worldwide distribution and habitat association of the

Indexed as

EcosystemSharksAnimalsBiodiversityEndangered SpeciesHumansInfant, NewbornTemperatureConservationEcosystemHabitat associationMarine protected areas

Identifiers

PMID37337585
PMCPMC10276984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.