ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2023
Resource Allocation Efficiency of Urban Medical and Health Financial Expenditure Under the Background of Employees' Health.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of equity and efficiency in health resource allocation in underdeveloped county areas: empirical research from Guangxi, China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Can public hospital reform reduce medical resource mismatches? Evidence from China.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Forecasting health financing sustainability under the unified pool reform: evidence from China's Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Can Comprehensive Medical Reform Improve the Efficiency of Medical Resource Allocation? Evidence From China.International journal of public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study proposes a method based on difference-in-differences (DID) to improve the resource allocation efficiency of medical and health financial expenditure to better guarantee the health level of enterprise employees. The DEA method is utilized to measure the comprehensive technology, pure technology, and scale as the resource allocation efficiency values of urban medical and health financial expenditure. Methods: The proposed method includes the use of DEA to measure the resource allocation efficiency values of urban medical and health financial expenditure. The benchmark regression model and DID model are used to analyze the impact effect, robustness, and parallel trend of the policy. Results: The study shows that the proposed method effectively evaluates and analyzes the impact of medical comprehensive reform on the resource allocation efficiency of urban medical and health financial expenditure. The comprehensive medical reform can improve the comprehensive efficiency and scale efficiency of urban medical and health financial expenditure, leading to improved resource allocation efficiency of urban employees' medical and health financial expenditure. The results also indicate a significant positive effect on the time trend, which can have a long-term impact and effectiveness. Discussion: The proposed method can provide useful insights into the resource allocation efficiency of medical and health financial expenditure, which can help improve the health level of enterprise employees. The study suggests that comprehensive medical reform can be an effective way to improve resource allocation efficiency and guarantee the health of employees in urban areas. Further research can be conducted to evaluate the impact of medical reform on other aspects of health care, such as quality and accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.