Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337530›Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2023

Muscle spindles as pain receptors.

Juhani V Partanen, Hanna-Reetta Lajunen, Sara K Liljander

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juhani V PartanenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9401-2915
Hanna-Reetta LajunenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Espoo, Finland.
Sara K LiljanderDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIAalto University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Muscle membranes have a sensation of pain, but within the muscle tissue, the origin of pain is unclear. We present a hypothesis that the pain receptors of the muscle tissue are situated principally in the muscle spindles. A recent report reintroduced that 'end plate spikes' in needle electromyography (EMG) are fusimotor unit potentials of the intrafusal muscle fibres, and thus represent a marker of muscle spindles. Methods: We studied four relaxed muscles with 50 EMG needle insertions in each and mapped the appearance of pain and spontaneous EMG activity. Results: Only 4.0% of the needle insertions in muscle tissue elicited pain. However, needle insertions in local active points showing 'end plate spikes' and, thus, fusimotor unit potentials of the muscle spindles elicited pain in 86% of the insertions, whereas needle insertions in points without 'end plate spikes' elicited pain in only 1.0% of the insertions (p<0.001). Conclusions: Muscle spindles have pain receptors. The extrafusal muscle tissue is practically pain-free for the needle insertions. This demonstrates a scarcity of extrafusal pain receptors. How this observation is put into perspective with the muscle pain syndromes was discussed.

Indexed as

EMGNEUROMUSCULARPAIN

Identifiers

PMID37337530
PMCPMC10277087
OpenAlexW4380786009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.