Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337479›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2023

Radiotherapy Use in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Review of the Guidelines and Impact of Increased Awareness in Patient Referral at a Tertiary Center in Belgium.

Flor Verghote, Charles Van Praet, Daan De Maeseneer, Camille Berquin, Ben Vanneste, Pieter De Visschere, Sofie L J Verbeke, Valérie Fonteyne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bladder Cancer and Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Applications.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flor VerghoteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-1394
Charles Van PraetDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Daan De MaeseneerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Camille BerquinDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ben VannesteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter De VisschereDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie L J VerbekeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-8581
Valérie FonteyneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Pronounced underuse of radiotherapy (RT) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is reported. This study aims to assess the awareness about the role of RT in different MIBC settings and see whether this has increased since 2017. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the bladder cancer guidelines of the EAU, ESMO, NCCN, NICE, and AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO, focusing on the role of RT in MIBC. In 2017, we evaluated the use of RT in MIBC in Belgium. This raised awareness about the indications of RT in different MIBC settings. Here, we present a retrospective pattern of care analysis of the RT use for MIBC patients at our center from January 2012 until December 2021. Frequency of RT use, patient, disease and treatment characteristics were compared between two 5-year periods (2012-2016 and 2017-2021). Results: Review of the guidelines suggested that RT can be used as a treatment option in most MIBC settings. However, differences between guideline recommendations existed and high-level evidence was often lacking. Overall, 221 unique MIBC patients received RT at our center. RT use for MIBC was 39% higher in the second 5-year period (Between the same periods, the number of new MIBC registrations increased with 26%). The most pronounced increase, ie, 529%, was observed in the primary setting and was in parallel with patient preference becoming the main indication for RT. Participation in clinical trials seems to have had an important impact on the frequency of RT use in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Conclusion: We provide a critical overview of the RT indications in MIBC as recommended by the international guidelines. Increased awareness about RT as a treatment option in MIBC seems to have an impact on the treatment choice in clinical practice, as was observed in our tertiary center.

Indexed as

patient preferencepatterns of careradiationunderutilizationurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37337479
PMCPMC10276995
OpenAlexW4380681512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.