Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337258›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2023

Prevalence and resistance profile of bacteria isolated from wound infections among a group of patients in upper Egypt: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Eman Farouk Ahmed, Asia Helmi Rasmi, Abdou M A Darwish, Gamal Fadl Mahmoud Gad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles and MLST Typing ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eman Farouk AhmedAssistant Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sohag University, 82524, Province, Sohag, Egypt. eman.farouk@pharm.sohag.edu.eg.
Asia Helmi RasmiTeaching assistant of Microbiology and Immunology, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deraya University, Elminya, Egypt.
Abdou M A DarwishProfessor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Elminya, Egypt.
Gamal Fadl Mahmoud GadProfessor at Microbiology and Immunology, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Elminya, Egypt.
Minia University · EGSohag University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis cross-sectional survey aimed to identify aerobic bacteria, antimicrobial resistance, and multi-drug resistance profiles of bacteria isolated from different wound infections among a group of Egyptian patients.

resultsOf 120 positive samples, 170 isolates were identified. Polymicrobial infections were determined in 55% of samples. The dominant Gram-positive isolated strains were Staphylococcus aureus, especially from wound infections because of accidents (71.8%). Piperacillin, methicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were all highly resistant to S. aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in wound infections was 89.9%. S. aureus showed superior sensitivity to vancomycin (85.3%) and linezolid (81.3%). The highest prevalence of Gram-negative isolates was for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (40%), which was highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin (79.2%) and highly resistant to levofloxacin (83.3%). Several isolates revealed a multi-drug resistance profile (52.4%). The overall MDR rate of Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates were 50% and 54.9%, respectively.

conclusionThe prevalence of MRSA isolated from various wound infections and MDR is a warning issue in Upper Egypt. It should implement a health education strategy and hygiene measures to prevent the spread of wound infection-causing organisms in the community.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsWound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCross-Sectional StudiesEgyptHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsEgyptMDRMRSAP. aeruginosaPrevalenceS. aureusWound infection

Identifiers

PMID37337258
PMCPMC10280819
OpenAlexW4381248855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.