Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337254›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023

Healthcare for individuals without health insurance in Germany - a mixed methods approach to assess the situation and current challenges.

Mathilde Stötzler, Andrea Kaifie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Access to healthcare for undocumented migrants in Germany-a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mathilde StötzlerInstitute for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Andrea KaifieInstitute for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. akaifie@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth insurance is mandatory in Germany; nevertheless, many individuals there have no health insurance and depend on a parallel healthcare structure. Voluntary associations, such as MediNetz and healthcare vouchers ("Anonymer Krankenschein" - AKS), support uninsured citizens. This study aimed to provide insights into associations, such as MediNetz and AKS that provide healthcare for individuals without health insurance in North Rhine-Westphalia, the largest federal state in Germany.

methodsA mixed methods approach was chosen. A qualitative study using interviews with experts was performed to gain their knowledge and explore the various challenges that AKS and MediNetz associations faced and the possible improvements that could be made. A quantitative survey was conducted to analyse the demographic data of the patients who required AKS or MediNetz's assistance and the characteristics of each association through a separate questionnaire. Data was received from the association in Aachen, Bielefeld, Bonn, Düsseldorf, and Essen.

resultsMore women than men sought medical care; most were between 25 and 49 years old. The proportion of individuals without residency status accounted for the largest share (53.6%). Common reasons for patients to make contact were acute illnesses (40.2%) and pregnancies (22.3%). Most patients were sent to gynaecologists and general practitioners. Asking the experts, it became apparent that the existing system could not reach the standard of the regular healthcare in Germany. Financial and human resources were insufficient. Therefore, prevention was limited, especially chronically ill patients or patients with a severe illness requiring hospitalisation could not be treated. AKS had advantages compared to MediNetz, as the care came closer to the expected German medical standards.

conclusionsThe results showed a demand for associations providing healthcare for individuals without health insurance. However, the healthcare provided by MediNetz and AKS did not reach the standard of healthcare in Germany and mainly depended on the organisations' resources. Funded projects such as an AKS combined with clearing centres significantly improved healthcare. Until structural measures are implemented, they can be a transitional solution by spreading nationwide.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityInsurance, HealthAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesAnonymer KrankenscheinEU citizensHealthcareHealth inequalityHealth insuranceMedical careMediNetzPregnancyUndocumented migrantsUninsured migrants

Identifiers

PMID37337254
PMCPMC10280908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.