Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337095›Full record

SynthesisNature human behaviour2023

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality.

Fan Wang, Yu Gao, Zhen Han, Yue Yu, Zhiping Long, Xianchen Jiang, Yi Wu, Bing Pei, Yukun Cao, Jingyu Ye and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature human behaviour, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 207 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fan Wang *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9869-9504
Yu Gao *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Zhen HanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Yue YuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Zhiping LongDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2325-6477
Xianchen JiangDepartment of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, P. R. China.
Yi WuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Bing PeiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Yukun CaoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Jingyu YeDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China.
Maoqing WangNational Key Disciplines of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China. wang_maoqing@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-1176
Yashuang ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, P. R. China. zhao_yashuang@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-5773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The associations between social isolation, loneliness and the risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are controversial. We systematically reviewed prospective studies on the association between social isolation, loneliness and mortality outcomes in adults aged 18 years or older, as well as studies on these relationships in individuals with CVD or cancer, and conducted a meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (reg. no. CRD42022299959). A total of 90 prospective cohort studies including 2,205,199 individuals were included. Here we show that, in the general population, both social isolation and loneliness were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (pooled effect size for social isolation, 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26 to 1.39; P < 0.001; pooled effect size for loneliness, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.20; P < 0.001) and cancer mortality (pooled effect size for social isolation, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.28; P < 0.001; pooled effect size for loneliness, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.17; P = 0.030). Social isolation also increased the risk of CVD mortality (1.34; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.44; P < 0.001). There was an increased risk of all-cause mortality in socially isolated individuals with CVD (1.28; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.48; P = 0.001) or breast cancer (1.51; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.70; P < 0.001), and individuals with breast cancer had a higher cancer-specific mortality owing to social isolation (1.33; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.75; P = 0.038). Greater focus on social isolation and loneliness may help improve people's well-being and mortality risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesAdultFemaleHumansLonelinessProspective StudiesSocial Isolation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.