Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337084›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

The effect of the enhanced recovery programme on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Joel Lambert, Thomas Mair, Kalaiyarasi Arujunan, Abdulwarith Shugaba, Harmony Uwadiae, Anne Livesey, Rami Ahmad, Georgios Sgourakis, Christopher Gaffney, Daren Subar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joel LambertBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Thomas MairBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Kalaiyarasi ArujunanBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Abdulwarith ShugabaBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Harmony UwadiaeBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Anne LiveseyBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Rami AhmadBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Georgios SgourakisBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
Christopher GaffneyLancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK. c.gaffney@lancaster.ac.uk.
Daren SubarBRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced recovery programmes are associated with improved short-term outcomes following liver surgery. The impact of enhanced recovery programmes on medium- and long-term outcomes is incompletely understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

methodsAt a tertiary hepatobiliary centre, we analysed short-, medium- and long-term outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. A five-year retrospective review was carried out comparing the enhanced recovery programme to standard care.

resultsA total of 172 patients were included in the analysis: 87 on standard care and 85 on an enhanced recovery programme. Open surgery was performed in 122 patients: 74 (85.1%) and 48 (56.5%) patients in the standard care and enhanced recovery programme, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the median (IQR) length of hospital stay in the enhanced recovery programme compared with standard care (7 (5) days vs. 8 (3) days, p = 0.0009). There was no significant difference in survival between standard care and the Enhanced Recovery Programme at one (p = 0.818), three (p = 0.203), and five years (p = 0.247).

conclusionAn enhanced recovery programme was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay. There was no effect on the one-, three- and five-year survival.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerEnhanced recovery programmeERP

Identifiers

PMID37337084
PMCPMC10279559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.