Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337020›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A novel hermit crab optimization algorithm.

Jia Guo, Guoyuan Zhou, Ke Yan, Binghua Shi, Yi Di, Yuji Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jia GuoSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China.
Guoyuan ZhouSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China.
Ke YanChina Construction Third Engineering Bureau Installation Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, 430075, China.
Binghua ShiSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China. shibinghua@hbue.edu.cn.
Yi DiSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China.
Yuji SatoFaculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Hosei University, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan.

Funding

Hubei Provincial Education Department Scientific Research Program Project Q20222202Ideological and Political Department Project of Hubei Province 21Q210Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 52201363Natural Science Foundation Hubei Province 2020CFB306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional optimization has numerous potential applications in both academia and industry. It is a major challenge for optimization algorithms to generate very accurate solutions in high-dimensional search spaces. However, traditional search tools are prone to dimensional catastrophes and local optima, thus failing to provide high-precision results. To solve these problems, a novel hermit crab optimization algorithm (the HCOA) is introduced in this paper. Inspired by the group behaviour of hermit crabs, the HCOA combines the optimal search and historical path search to balance the depth and breadth searches. In the experimental section of the paper, the HCOA competes with 5 well-known metaheuristic algorithms in the CEC2017 benchmark functions, which contain 29 functions, with 23 of these ranking first. The state of work BPSO-CM is also chosen to compare with the HCOA, and the competition shows that the HCOA has a better performance in the 100-dimensional test of the CEC2017 benchmark functions. All the experimental results demonstrate that the HCOA presents highly accurate and robust results for high-dimensional optimization problems.

Identifiers

PMID37337020
PMCPMC10279639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.