Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37336875›Full record

ArticleCell discovery2023

Integrative scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq analyses map thymic iNKT cell development and identify Cbfβ for its commitment.

Jie Wang, Indra Adrianto, Kalpana Subedi, Tingting Liu, Xiaojun Wu, Qijun Yi, Ian Loveless, Congcong Yin, Indrani Datta, Derek B Sant'Angelo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Innate-like T cell subset commitment in the murine thymus is independent of TCR characteristics and occurs during proliferation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie Wang *Center for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Indra Adrianto *Center for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9973-3057
Kalpana SubediCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Tingting LiuCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Xiaojun WuCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Qijun YiCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Ian LovelessCenter for Bioinformatics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-6559
Congcong YinCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-2823
Indrani DattaCenter for Bioinformatics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Derek B Sant'AngeloChild Health Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Mitchell KronenbergLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, 9420 Athena Circle, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Li ZhouCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA. lzhou1@hfhs.org.
Qing-Sheng MiCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA. QMI1@hfhs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1411-6827
Henry Ford Health System · USLa Jolla Institute for Immunology · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Development and Function of NKT CellsR37AI071922 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI KRONENBERG, MITCHELL · 2006 to 2015
$4.9M
Differentiation of subsets of NKT cellsR01AI071922 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI KRONENBERG, MITCHELL · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
microRNAs and NKT cell development and functionR01AI119041 · NIAID · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI MI, QING-SHENG · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Uncover the new subsets of epidermal Langerhans cellsR61AR076803 · NIAMS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ADRIANTO, INDRA, MI, QING-SHENG · 2019 to 2020
$746k
Genetic risk of hidradenitis suppurativa in African AmericansR21AR079089 · NIAMS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ADRIANTO, INDRA, MI, QING-SHENG · 2022 to 2023
$520k
Uncover the new subsets of epidermal Langerhans cellsR33AR076803 · NIAMS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ADRIANTO, INDRA, MI, QING-SHENG · 2021 to 2021
$380k
microRNAs and NKT cell development and functionR56AI119041 · NIAID · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI MI, QING-SHENG · 2015 to 2015
$371k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071922NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI119041NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI071922NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI119041NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR079089NIAMS NIH HHS R33 AR076803NIAMS NIH HHS R61 AR076803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike conventional αβT cells, invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells complete their terminal differentiation to functional iNKT1/2/17 cells in the thymus. However, underlying molecular programs that guide iNKT subset differentiation remain unclear. Here, we profiled the transcriptomes of over 17,000 iNKT cells and the chromatin accessibility states of over 39,000 iNKT cells across four thymic iNKT developmental stages using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq) to define their developmental trajectories. Our study discovered novel features for iNKT precursors and different iNKT subsets and indicated that iNKT2 and iNKT17 lineage commitment may occur as early as stage 0 (ST0) by two distinct programs, while iNKT1 commitments may occur post ST0. Both iNKT1 and iNKT2 cells exhibit extensive phenotypic and functional heterogeneity, while iNKT17 cells are relatively homogenous. Furthermore, we identified that a novel transcription factor, Cbfβ, was highly expressed in iNKT progenitor commitment checkpoint, which showed a similar expression trajectory with other known transcription factors for iNKT cells development, Zbtb16 and Egr2, and could direct iNKT cells fate and drive their effector phenotype differentiation. Conditional deletion of Cbfβ blocked early iNKT cell development and led to severe impairment of iNKT1/2/17 cell differentiation. Overall, our findings uncovered distinct iNKT developmental programs as well as their cellular heterogeneity, and identified a novel transcription factor Cbfβ as a key regulator for early iNKT cell commitment.

Identifiers

PMID37336875
PMCPMC10279728
OpenAlexW4381309513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.